REET vs. UGA
REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - REET is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REET returned 4.37%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for UGA. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REET charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
REET vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return. Over the past 10 years, REET has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 4.37%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.
REET
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- 1Y
- 14.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- 4.37%
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
REET vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 11.67% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | -10.48% | 24.42% | -5.27% | 7.48% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between REET and UGA is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2014 | 0.11 |
The correlation between REET and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REET vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
REET
UGA
REET vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REET | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 3.17 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | 9.39 | -3.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REET vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REET | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -86.59% | +42.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -18.96% | +9.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -26.68% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.11% | -38.11% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.59% | -75.89% | +31.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -18.05% | +17.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.75% | -36.69% | +26.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 6.43% | -3.91% |
Volatility
REET vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is 4.36%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that REET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REET | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 9.24% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 30.57% | -21.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.52% | 35.22% | -22.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 34.45% | -17.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 37.22% | -18.37% |
REET vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
REET vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.37% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REET and UGA have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to REET (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.31% vs 4.37% for REET. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 4.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
REET is categorized as REIT, while UGA is Oil & Gas. REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REET and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer