REET vs. BLDG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG).
REET and BLDG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. REET is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2014. BLDG is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Sep 24, 2020.
Performance
REET vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
REET vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 2.31% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | 17.53% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | -0.71% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's -0.71% return.
REET
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -6.30%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- 3.57%
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -7.55%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -4.12%
- 1Y
- 6.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.76%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
REET vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
REET vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
REET
BLDG
REET vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 0.47 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | 0.73 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.10 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 0.58 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.04 | 2.11 | +0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 0.47 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.15 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.38 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between REET and BLDG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
REET vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than BLDG's 6.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.62% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 6.11% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
REET vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and BLDG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| REET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -27.25% | -17.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.70% | -10.80% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.11% | -27.25% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -8.75% | +2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.91% | -9.44% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.98% | -0.16% |
Volatility
REET vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 4.17%. This indicates that REET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| REET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 4.17% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 7.34% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 13.30% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 15.22% | +1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 15.60% | +3.23% |