REET vs. BLDG
REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. REET is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, REET returned 2.82%/yr vs 3.04%/yr for BLDG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REET charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
REET vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's 10.61% return.
REET
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 12.16%
- 6M
- 11.93%
- 1Y
- 14.32%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 2.82%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- —
REET vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 12.16% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | 18.06% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 10.61% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between REET and BLDG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between REET and BLDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REET vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
REET
BLDG
REET vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.25 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.73 | 4.38 | +1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REET vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -27.25% | -17.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -10.08% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -18.57% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.11% | -27.25% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -1.07% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -9.14% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 2.87% | -0.35% |
Volatility
REET vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is 4.37%, while Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that REET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 4.65% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 9.07% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 11.59% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 15.29% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 15.55% | +3.30% |
REET vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
REET vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than BLDG's 5.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.31% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.36% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REET and BLDG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLDG has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to REET (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs BLDG's -27.25%.
On 5-year performance, BLDG leads with 3.04% vs 2.82% for REET. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 3.04% return vs 2.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 3.36% for REET.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.59% for BLDG.
REET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REET and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer