PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BLDG vs. FLJH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BLDG and FLJH is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

BLDG vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.40%
4.43%
BLDG
FLJH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLDG:

0.86

FLJH:

0.87

Sortino Ratio

BLDG:

1.22

FLJH:

1.21

Omega Ratio

BLDG:

1.16

FLJH:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

BLDG:

0.59

FLJH:

0.84

Martin Ratio

BLDG:

3.53

FLJH:

2.87

Ulcer Index

BLDG:

3.32%

FLJH:

5.98%

Daily Std Dev

BLDG:

13.67%

FLJH:

19.78%

Max Drawdown

BLDG:

-27.25%

FLJH:

-31.36%

Current Drawdown

BLDG:

-7.45%

FLJH:

-2.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLDG achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 0.57% return.


BLDG

YTD

0.19%

1M

0.60%

6M

2.40%

1Y

10.71%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FLJH

YTD

0.57%

1M

0.16%

6M

5.17%

1Y

18.36%

5Y*

16.78%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BLDG vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLDG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio.


BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
Expense ratio chart for BLDG: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%
Expense ratio chart for FLJH: current value at 0.09% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.09%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLDG vs. FLJH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLDG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLDG is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLDG is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLDG is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLDG is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLDG is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLDG is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLJH is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLJH is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLJH is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLJH is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLJH is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLJH is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLDG vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BLDG, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.860.88
The chart of Sortino ratio for BLDG, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.221.22
The chart of Omega ratio for BLDG, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.161.18
The chart of Calmar ratio for BLDG, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.590.86
The chart of Martin ratio for BLDG, currently valued at 3.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.532.92
BLDG
FLJH

The current BLDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLDG and FLJH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.86
0.88
BLDG
FLJH

Dividends

BLDG vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

BLDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than FLJH's 5.03% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
7.96%7.97%4.99%3.99%10.40%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
5.03%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.05%

Drawdowns

BLDG vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLDG drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, smaller than the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDG and FLJH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-7.45%
-2.80%
BLDG
FLJH

Volatility

BLDG vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) is 3.61%, while Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that BLDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.61%
4.40%
BLDG
FLJH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab