REAI vs. RDOG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

REAI (Intelligent Real Estate ETF) and RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) are both REIT funds. REAI is actively managed, while RDOG is passively managed. Over the past year, REAI returned 13.25% vs 20.06% for RDOG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REAI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RDOG.

Performance

REAI vs. RDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intelligent Real Estate ETF (REAI) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with REAI having a 13.24% return and RDOG slightly higher at 13.77%.

REAI

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -0.84%
• YTD: 13.24%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 13.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RDOG

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 3.92%
• YTD: 13.77%
• 6M: 14.44%
• 1Y: 20.06%
• 3Y*: 11.40%
• 5Y*: 2.28%
• 10Y*: 4.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REAI vs. RDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
REAI Intelligent Real Estate ETF	13.24%	-6.08%	8.00%	1.46%
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	13.77%	0.95%	4.57%	12.13%

Correlation

The correlation between REAI and RDOG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2023	0.84

The correlation between REAI and RDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REAI vs. RDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REAI	RDOG
Real Estate	97.9%	100.0%
Technology	2.1%	-
Communication Services	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

REAI vs. RDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REAI

REAI Risk / Return Rank: 25
REAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
REAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
REAI Omega Ratio Rank: 24
REAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
REAI Martin Ratio Rank: 24

RDOG

RDOG Risk / Return Rank: 39
RDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
RDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
RDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
RDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
RDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REAI vs. RDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intelligent Real Estate ETF (REAI) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REAI	RDOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.39	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	2.03	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.24	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	2.01	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.08	6.51	-3.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REAI vs. RDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REAI Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the RDOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REAI and RDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REAI	RDOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	1.39	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.17	+0.13

Drawdowns

REAI vs. RDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REAI drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum RDOG drawdown of -67.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REAI and RDOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	REAI	RDOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.29%	-67.59%	+45.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-10.02%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.62%	-2.03%	-1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.30%	-12.26%	+4.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.31%	3.09%	+1.22%

Volatility

REAI vs. RDOG - Volatility Comparison

Intelligent Real Estate ETF (REAI) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) have volatilities of 3.87% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REAI	RDOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	3.98%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.47%	10.42%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.39%	14.52%	+0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.06%	19.84%	-1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.06%	23.05%	-4.99%

REAI vs. RDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

REAI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RDOG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

REAI vs. RDOG - Dividend Comparison

REAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than RDOG's 6.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	6.13%	6.91%	6.11%	7.07%	5.25%	3.11%	5.12%	3.10%	3.13%	3.64%	3.66%	3.43%
REAI Intelligent Real Estate ETF	3.27%	4.52%	3.34%	1.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REAI and RDOG in my portfolio?

REAI and RDOG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REAI or RDOG?

RDOG has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to REAI (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REAI dropped -22.29% vs RDOG's -67.59%.

Which ETF is better, REAI or RDOG?

On 1-year performance, RDOG leads with 20.06% vs 13.25% for REAI. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, REAI has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REAI or RDOG?

Over the 1-year period, RDOG has performed better with a 20.06% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REAI or RDOG?

RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REAI or RDOG?

RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.13%, compared with 3.27% for REAI.

What is the main difference between REAI and RDOG?

They also come from different issuers: Armada ETF Advisors and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REAI and 0.35% for RDOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.