REAI vs. DFGR
REAI (Intelligent Real Estate ETF) and DFGR (Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, REAI returned 14.52% vs 10.05% for DFGR. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REAI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DFGR.
Performance
REAI vs. DFGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REAI achieves a 14.15% return, which is significantly higher than DFGR's 7.92% return.
REAI
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 14.15%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 14.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFGR
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 7.92%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 10.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REAI vs. DFGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
REAI Intelligent Real Estate ETF | 14.15% | -6.08% | 8.00% | 1.46% |
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF | 7.92% | 7.65% | 1.89% | 9.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between REAI and DFGR is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between REAI and DFGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
REAI vs. DFGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REAI
DFGR
Real Estate
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
REAI
DFGR
Technology
REAI
DFGR
Communication Services
REAI
DFGR
Basic Materials
REAI
-
DFGR
-
Consumer Cyclical
REAI
-
DFGR
Consumer Defensive
REAI
-
DFGR
Energy
REAI
-
DFGR
Financial Services
REAI
-
DFGR
Healthcare
REAI
-
DFGR
Industrials
REAI
-
DFGR
Utilities
REAI
-
DFGR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REAI vs. DFGR — Risk / Return Rank
REAI
DFGR
REAI vs. DFGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intelligent Real Estate ETF (REAI) and Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REAI | DFGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.85 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.23 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.14 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | 4.05 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REAI | DFGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.85 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.48 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
REAI vs. DFGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REAI drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, roughly equal to the maximum DFGR drawdown of -21.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REAI and DFGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REAI | DFGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -21.28% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -9.15% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -2.49% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -6.31% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 2.57% | +1.73% |
Volatility
REAI vs. DFGR - Volatility Comparison
Intelligent Real Estate ETF (REAI) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) at 3.66%. This indicates that REAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REAI | DFGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 3.66% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 8.81% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 11.86% | +3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 15.43% | +2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 15.43% | +2.64% |
REAI vs. DFGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
REAI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGR's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
REAI vs. DFGR - Dividend Comparison
REAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than DFGR's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF | 3.94% | 4.05% | 3.73% | 2.77% | 0.59% |
REAI Intelligent Real Estate ETF | 3.25% | 4.52% | 3.34% | 1.99% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REAI and DFGR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REAI has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to DFGR (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REAI dropped -22.29% vs DFGR's -21.28%.
On 1-year performance, REAI leads with 14.52% vs 10.05% for DFGR. On fees, DFGR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, DFGR has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, REAI has performed better with a 14.52% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFGR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REAI.
DFGR has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 3.25% for REAI.
They also come from different issuers: Armada ETF Advisors and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REAI and 0.22% for DFGR.
REAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REAI and DFGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer