RDYY vs. GDXY
RDYY (YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF) and GDXY (YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while GDXY is a Gold fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for GDXY.
Performance
RDYY vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDYY achieves a -23.45% return, which is significantly lower than GDXY's -15.78% return.
RDYY
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- 14.72%
- YTD
- -23.45%
- 6M
- -22.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXY
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- -9.62%
- YTD
- -15.78%
- 6M
- -19.56%
- 1Y
- 17.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDYY vs. GDXY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | -23.45% | -5.31% |
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF | -15.78% | 18.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDYY and GDXY is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDYY vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank
RDYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDXY
RDYY vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF (RDYY) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDYY | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDYY vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDYY drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, which is greater than GDXY's maximum drawdown of -34.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDYY and GDXY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDYY | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.16% | -34.16% | -17.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.72% | -32.39% | -2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -6.97% | -21.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.81% | — |
Volatility
RDYY vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDYY | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.93% | 38.62% | +16.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.93% | 32.58% | +22.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.93% | 32.58% | +22.35% |
RDYY vs. GDXY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXY's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDYY vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison
RDYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 92.82%, more than GDXY's 78.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF | 78.76% | 52.13% | 23.91% |
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | 92.82% | 25.20% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDYY and GDXY have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RDYY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RDYY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for GDXY.
RDYY has the higher dividend yield at 92.82%, compared with 78.76% for GDXY.
RDYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GDXY is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RDYY and 1.08% for GDXY.
Find the right allocation for RDYY and GDXY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer