RDYY vs. CONY

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

RDYY (YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

RDYY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF (RDYY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDYY achieves a -16.60% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -26.27% return.

RDYY

• 1D: -5.19%
• 1M: 4.81%
• 6M: -15.11%
• YTD: -16.60%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONY

• 1D: -2.66%
• 1M: -4.31%
• 6M: -29.43%
• YTD: -26.27%
• 1Y: -57.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDYY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF	-16.60%	-5.31%
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	-26.27%	-25.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RDYY and CONY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

RDYY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CONY

CONY Risk / Return Rank: 2
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDYY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF (RDYY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDYY	CONY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.99	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.59	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.82	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.90	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.34	—

Drawdowns

RDYY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDYY drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDYY and CONY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDYY	CONY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.16%	-63.57%	+12.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-63.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.87%	-58.23%	+29.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.70%	-23.63%	-5.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	42.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RDYY	CONY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.42%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.28%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.59%	57.81%	-2.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.59%	59.69%	-4.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.59%	59.69%	-4.10%

RDYY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RDYY and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

RDYY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

RDYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 99.32%, less than CONY's 192.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	192.21%	192.07%	155.66%	16.43%
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF	99.32%	25.20%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDYY and CONY in my portfolio?

RDYY and CONY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RDYY or CONY?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDYY or CONY?

RDYY and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDYY or CONY?

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 192.21%, compared with 99.32% for RDYY.