RDWU vs. NTSD
RDWU (T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RDWU is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
RDWU vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RDWU
- 1D
- 31.87%
- 1M
- 376.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDWU vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RDWU T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF | 214.49% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 19.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDWU and NTSD is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDWU vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDWU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 5.46 | -3.93 |
Drawdowns
RDWU vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDWU drawdown since its inception was -66.94%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWU and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDWU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.94% | -5.20% | -61.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.27% | -0.04% | -35.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.07% | -0.83% | -42.24% |
Volatility
RDWU vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDWU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 255.53% | 24.10% | +231.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 255.53% | 24.10% | +231.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 255.53% | 24.10% | +231.43% |
RDWU vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDWU vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither RDWU nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RDWU and NTSD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDWU.
RDWU and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDWU and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for RDWU and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer