RDWR vs. ASML
RDWR (Radware Ltd.) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — RDWR in Software - Infrastructure, ASML in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, RDWR returned 8.07%/yr vs 32.35%/yr for ASML. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RDWR vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDWR achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 54.27% return. Over the past 10 years, RDWR has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 8.07%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 32.35% annualized return.
RDWR
- 1D
- 4.85%
- 1M
- -7.51%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- -3.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.92%
ASML
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- YTD
- 54.27%
- 1Y
- 139.68%
- 3Y*
- 35.61%
- 5Y*
- 16.81%
- 10Y*
- 32.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.19B | $3.43B | $3.46B | |
RDWR Radware Ltd. | $8.58M | $8.18M | $7.26M |
RDWR vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDWR Radware Ltd. | 13.99% | 6.92% | 35.07% | -15.54% | -52.57% | 50.05% | 7.64% | 13.52% | 17.06% | 33.06% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 54.27% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -9.80% | 56.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDWR and ASML is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1999 | 0.33 |
The correlation between RDWR and ASML shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RDWR:
$1.18B
ASML:
$633.06B
RDWR:
$0.38
ASML:
€27.54
RDWR:
72.21
ASML:
51.66
RDWR:
2.02
ASML:
3.40
RDWR:
3.85
ASML:
15.56
RDWR:
3.78
ASML:
25.09
RDWR:
$317.65M
ASML:
€35.33B
RDWR:
$256.68M
ASML:
€18.63B
RDWR:
$38.33M
ASML:
€13.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDWR vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
RDWR
ASML
RDWR vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Radware Ltd. (RDWR) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDWR | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.41 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 6.40 | -6.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.86 | 21.60 | -20.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDWR vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDWR drawdown since its inception was -93.76%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWR and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDWR | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.76% | -90.00% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.33% | -21.95% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.42% | -45.38% | +15.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.55% | -56.84% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.55% | -56.84% | -8.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.21% | -17.33% | -16.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.91% | -28.04% | -32.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.78% | 6.49% | +3.29% |
Volatility
RDWR vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
Radware Ltd. (RDWR) has a higher volatility of 23.50% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 14.07%. This indicates that RDWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDWR | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.50% | 14.07% | +9.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.14% | 37.25% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.71% | 45.98% | -5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.25% | 43.27% | -5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.27% | 39.14% | -6.87% |
Dividends
RDWR vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
RDWR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.55% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
RDWR Radware Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RDWR vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Radware Ltd. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RDWR vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison
RDWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Radware Ltd. reported a gross profit of 66.46M and revenue of 82.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.8%.
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 5.04B and revenue of 9.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.
RDWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Radware Ltd. reported an operating income of 2.47M and revenue of 82.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.46B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.
RDWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Radware Ltd. reported a net income of 1.71M and revenue of 82.28M, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.92B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RDWR and ASML have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDWR has higher volatility (23.50%) compared to ASML (14.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDWR dropped -93.76% vs ASML's -90.00%.
ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDWR and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer