PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDWR vs. WOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RDWR vs. WOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Radware Ltd. (RDWR) and Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDWR achieves a 14.78% return, which is significantly lower than WOR's 20.10% return. Over the past 10 years, RDWR has underperformed WOR with an annualized return of 9.36%, while WOR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.49% annualized return.


RDWR

1D
2.03%
1M
-6.37%
YTD
14.78%
6M
13.32%
1Y
0.58%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
-2.16%
10Y*
9.36%

WOR

1D
1.80%
1M
11.87%
YTD
20.10%
6M
17.33%
1Y
6.76%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDWR vs. WOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDWR
Radware Ltd.
14.78%6.92%35.07%-15.54%-52.57%50.05%7.64%13.52%17.06%33.06%
WOR
Worthington Industries, Inc.
20.10%30.29%-29.34%91.65%-6.90%8.43%25.21%24.08%-19.30%-5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RDWR and WOR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1999

0.25

The correlation between RDWR and WOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RDWR:

$1.23B

WOR:

$3.02B

EPS

RDWR:

$0.43

WOR:

$2.27

PE Ratio

RDWR:

63.63

WOR:

27.06

PS Ratio

RDWR:

4.00

WOR:

2.28

PB Ratio

RDWR:

3.76

WOR:

3.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

RDWR:

$309.58M

WOR:

$1.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RDWR:

$250.12M

WOR:

$369.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

RDWR:

$27.98M

WOR:

$159.44M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDWR vs. WOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDWR
RDWR Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
RDWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RDWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

WOR
WOR Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
WOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
WOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDWR vs. WOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Radware Ltd. (RDWR) and Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDWRWORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.07

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

0.23

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.03

0.42

-0.39

RDWR vs. WOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the WOR Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDWR and WOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDWR vs. WOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDWR drawdown since its inception was -93.76%, which is greater than WOR's maximum drawdown of -70.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWR and WOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDWRWORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.76%

-70.94%

-22.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.42%

-29.83%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.42%

-42.42%

+13.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.55%

-42.42%

-23.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.55%

-64.53%

-1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.76%

-7.52%

-26.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.04%

-20.22%

-40.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.23%

16.15%

+1.08%

Volatility

RDWR vs. WOR - Volatility Comparison

Radware Ltd. (RDWR) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) at 4.95%. This indicates that RDWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDWRWORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.10%

4.95%

+7.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.13%

20.40%

+8.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.59%

29.22%

+6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.04%

38.16%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.61%

39.98%

-8.37%

Dividends

RDWR vs. WOR - Dividend Comparison

RDWR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDWR
Radware Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WOR
Worthington Industries, Inc.
1.24%1.40%1.65%49.97%2.37%1.99%1.91%2.23%2.53%1.86%1.64%2.46%

Financials

RDWR vs. WOR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Radware Ltd. and Worthington Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
79.81M
378.68M
(RDWR) Total Revenue
(WOR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RDWR vs. WOR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Radware Ltd. and Worthington Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
81.1%
29.1%
Portfolio components
RDWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radware Ltd. reported a gross profit of 64.70M and revenue of 79.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.1%.

WOR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.20M and revenue of 378.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.1%.

RDWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radware Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.81M and revenue of 79.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

WOR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 28.15M and revenue of 378.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

RDWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radware Ltd. reported a net income of 3.54M and revenue of 79.81M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.

WOR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.46M and revenue of 378.68M, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RDWR and WOR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDWR has higher volatility (12.10%) compared to WOR (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDWR dropped -93.76% vs WOR's -70.94%.

WOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDWR and WOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer