RDW vs. LAES
RDW (Redwire Corporation) and LAES (SEALSQ Corp) are both stocks. RDW operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, RDW returned 79.83%/yr vs -33.31%/yr for LAES. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RDW vs. LAES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDW achieves a 98.95% return, which is significantly higher than LAES's -17.99% return.
RDW
- 1D
- -11.53%
- 1M
- 31.94%
- YTD
- 98.95%
- 6M
- 107.41%
- 1Y
- -21.74%
- 3Y*
- 79.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LAES
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- -17.99%
- 6M
- -26.89%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- -33.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDW vs. LAES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RDW Redwire Corporation | 98.95% | -53.83% | 477.54% | 10.47% |
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -17.99% | -38.54% | 380.47% | -92.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDW and LAES is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023 | 0.33 |
The correlation between RDW and LAES shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RDW:
-$2.16
LAES:
-$0.43
RDW:
5.66
LAES:
10.21
RDW:
$370.96M
LAES:
$35.37M
RDW:
$34.05M
LAES:
$13.21M
RDW:
-$221.85M
LAES:
-$41.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDW vs. LAES — Risk / Return Rank
RDW
LAES
RDW vs. LAES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwire Corporation (RDW) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDW | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.04 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | -0.37 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | -0.62 | +0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDW vs. LAES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDW drawdown since its inception was -87.26%, smaller than the maximum LAES drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDW and LAES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDW | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.26% | -98.44% | +11.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.40% | -72.68% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.28% | -98.07% | +17.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.62% | -85.89% | +44.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.30% | -84.60% | +25.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.88% | 43.58% | +8.30% |
Volatility
RDW vs. LAES - Volatility Comparison
Redwire Corporation (RDW) has a higher volatility of 53.68% compared to SEALSQ Corp (LAES) at 28.38%. This indicates that RDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDW | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 53.68% | 28.38% | +25.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.49% | 66.23% | +28.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.63% | 109.13% | +9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.83% | 170.29% | -73.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.83% | 170.29% | -73.46% |
Dividends
RDW vs. LAES - Dividend Comparison
Neither RDW nor LAES has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RDW vs. LAES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Redwire Corporation and SEALSQ Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RDW and LAES have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDW has higher volatility (53.68%) compared to LAES (28.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDW dropped -87.26% vs LAES's -98.44%.
RDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDW and LAES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer