PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDVY vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDVY vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVY achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 10.75% return.


RDVY

1D
0.36%
1M
1.19%
6M
12.71%
YTD
17.25%
1Y
30.74%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
16.25%
ALL TIME*
13.76%

WNTR

1D
3.26%
1M
8.13%
6M
14.92%
YTD
10.75%
1Y
107.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
47.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$77.65M$79.19M$83.63M
$4.02M$3.86M$3.95M

RDVY vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDVY and WNTR is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDVY vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RDVY vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDVYWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.71

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

6.87

+6.77

RDVY vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVY Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVY and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDVY vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, roughly equal to the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVY and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDVYWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-42.65%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-42.65%

+33.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.64%

+9.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-20.18%

+15.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

16.81%

-14.66%

Volatility

RDVY vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) is 3.53%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that RDVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDVYWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

14.85%

-11.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

47.43%

-35.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

54.68%

-40.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

53.42%

-34.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

53.42%

-32.39%

RDVY vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDVY has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDVY vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than WNTR's 107.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.83%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%
WNTR
YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF
107.02%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDVY and WNTR have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to RDVY (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVY dropped -40.60% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 107.38% vs 30.74% for RDVY. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 107.38% return vs 30.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 0.83% for RDVY.

RDVY is categorized as Dividend, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for RDVY and 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDVY and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer