RDVY vs. SYLD
RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) and SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDVY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while SYLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. RDVY is passively managed, while SYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDVY returned 16.29%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for SYLD. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RDVY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SYLD.
Performance
RDVY vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDVY achieves a 13.41% return, which is significantly lower than SYLD's 17.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RDVY has outperformed SYLD with an annualized return of 16.29%, while SYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.58% annualized return.
RDVY
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 13.41%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 31.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- 16.29%
SYLD
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
RDVY vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 13.41% | 18.90% | 16.41% | 20.38% | -13.27% | 31.14% | 13.47% | 37.71% | -9.92% | 22.75% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 17.19% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 20.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVY and SYLD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014 | 0.88 |
The correlation between RDVY and SYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RDVY vs. SYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDVY
SYLD
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
RDVY
SYLD
Technology
RDVY
SYLD
Industrials
RDVY
SYLD
Consumer Cyclical
RDVY
SYLD
Communication Services
RDVY
SYLD
Healthcare
RDVY
SYLD
Consumer Defensive
RDVY
SYLD
Energy
RDVY
SYLD
Utilities
RDVY
SYLD
-
Basic Materials
RDVY
-
SYLD
Real Estate
RDVY
-
SYLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDVY vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank
RDVY
SYLD
RDVY vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDVY | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 4.07 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | 11.04 | +2.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDVY vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum SYLD drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVY and SYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVY | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -45.36% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -6.93% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.11% | -26.62% | +7.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.32% | -26.62% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | -45.36% | +4.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -5.65% | +0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.55% | -0.40% |
Volatility
RDVY vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) at 3.35%. This indicates that RDVY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDVY | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 3.35% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 9.75% | +1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.48% | 15.59% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 20.61% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 22.95% | -1.82% |
RDVY vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDVY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDVY vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison
RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than SYLD's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 0.89% | 1.11% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 2.07% | 2.14% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.81% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDVY and SYLD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDVY has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to SYLD (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVY dropped -40.60% vs SYLD's -45.36%.
On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.29% vs 13.58% for SYLD. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.29% return vs 13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDVY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SYLD.
SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.89% for RDVY.
RDVY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SYLD is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RDVY and 0.59% for SYLD.
RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDVY and SYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer