PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDVY vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDVY vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVY achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 12.65% return.


RDVY

1D
1.13%
1M
3.30%
YTD
11.06%
6M
11.87%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
15.65%

CGDV

1D
0.68%
1M
5.08%
YTD
12.65%
6M
13.07%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
25.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVY vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
11.06%18.90%16.41%20.38%-7.02%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
12.65%25.50%20.10%28.81%-2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVY and CGDV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.87

The correlation between RDVY and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

RDVY vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDVY
CGDV

Financial Services

36.5%
6.8%

Technology

17.6%
34.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
10.6%

Industrials

12.2%
13.2%

Healthcare

8.1%
11.5%

Communication Services

5.4%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
5.5%

Energy

1.4%
3.8%

Utilities

1.4%
2.1%

Basic Materials

-

2.9%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Financial Services

RDVY
36.5%
CGDV
6.8%

Technology

RDVY
17.6%
CGDV
34.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RDVY
12.2%
CGDV
10.6%

Industrials

RDVY
12.2%
CGDV
13.2%

Healthcare

RDVY
8.1%
CGDV
11.5%

Communication Services

RDVY
5.4%
CGDV
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

RDVY
4.1%
CGDV
5.5%

Energy

RDVY
1.4%
CGDV
3.8%

Utilities

RDVY
1.4%
CGDV
2.1%

Basic Materials

RDVY

-

CGDV
2.9%

Real Estate

RDVY

-

CGDV
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDVY vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVY vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDVYCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.51

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

3.25

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.11

15.36

-2.25

RDVY vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVY Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVY and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDVYCGDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.73

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.25

-0.59

Drawdowns

RDVY vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVY and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDVYCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-21.82%

-18.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-9.75%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.11%

-14.28%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-3.61%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.06%

+0.08%

Volatility

RDVY vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.08%. This indicates that RDVY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDVYCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.08%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

9.15%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

11.58%

+2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

15.48%

+3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

15.48%

+5.63%

RDVY vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDVY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDVY vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than CGDV's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.16%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.91%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDVY and CGDV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVY has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to CGDV (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVY dropped -40.60% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 25.65% vs 21.09% for RDVY. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 25.65% return vs 21.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RDVY.

CGDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.91% for RDVY.

RDVY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RDVY and 0.33% for CGDV.

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDVY and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer