RDVI vs. XLKI
RDVI (FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) and XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDVI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while XLKI is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by State Street. RDVI is passively managed, while XLKI is actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDVI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLKI.
Performance
RDVI vs. XLKI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDVI achieves a 15.18% return, which is significantly higher than XLKI's 13.37% return.
RDVI
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 15.18%
- 6M
- 13.32%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLKI
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- YTD
- 13.37%
- 6M
- 12.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDVI vs. XLKI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 15.18% | 8.76% |
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 13.37% | 10.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVI and XLKI is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.65 |
RDVI vs. XLKI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDVI
XLKI
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
RDVI
XLKI
Technology
RDVI
XLKI
Industrials
RDVI
XLKI
-
Consumer Cyclical
RDVI
XLKI
-
Communication Services
RDVI
XLKI
Healthcare
RDVI
XLKI
-
Consumer Defensive
RDVI
XLKI
-
Energy
RDVI
XLKI
-
Utilities
RDVI
XLKI
-
Basic Materials
RDVI
-
XLKI
-
Real Estate
RDVI
-
XLKI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDVI vs. XLKI — Risk / Return Rank
RDVI
XLKI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RDVI vs. XLKI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDVI | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.89 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDVI vs. XLKI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVI drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, which is greater than XLKI's maximum drawdown of -10.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVI and XLKI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVI | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -10.24% | -8.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.45% | +4.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -1.79% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | — | — |
Volatility
RDVI vs. XLKI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDVI | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.82% | 18.43% | -4.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 18.43% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 18.43% | -1.48% |
RDVI vs. XLKI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDVI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDVI vs. XLKI - Dividend Comparison
RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, less than XLKI's 14.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 8.30% | 8.10% | 8.62% | 8.45% | 1.53% |
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.75% | 8.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDVI and XLKI have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RDVI.
XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 14.75%, compared with 8.30% for RDVI.
RDVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while XLKI is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RDVI and 0.35% for XLKI.
Find the right allocation for RDVI and XLKI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer