PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDVI vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDVI vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVI achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.


RDVI

1D
0.07%
1M
2.77%
YTD
9.43%
6M
10.61%
1Y
24.98%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
10Y*

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVI vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RDVI
FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
9.43%17.93%14.56%18.63%9.91%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVI and USL is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2022

0.13

The correlation between RDVI and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RDVI vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDVI
USL

Financial Services

36.5%
4.5%

Technology

17.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%

-

Industrials

12.2%

-

Healthcare

8.1%

-

Communication Services

5.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.1%

-

Energy

1.4%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

RDVI
36.5%
USL
4.5%

Technology

RDVI
17.6%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

RDVI
12.2%
USL

-

Industrials

RDVI
12.2%
USL

-

Healthcare

RDVI
8.1%
USL

-

Communication Services

RDVI
5.4%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

RDVI
4.1%
USL

-

Energy

RDVI
1.4%
USL

-

Utilities

RDVI
1.4%
USL

-

Basic Materials

RDVI

-

USL

-

Real Estate

RDVI

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDVI vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDVI
RDVI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
RDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVI vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDVIUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.47

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

7.02

+5.46

RDVI vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVI and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDVIUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.04

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.01

+1.18

Drawdowns

RDVI vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVI drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVI and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDVIUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.35%

-89.06%

+70.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-16.76%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-23.33%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-38.16%

+37.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-61.46%

+58.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

8.27%

-6.26%

Volatility

RDVI vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) is 3.66%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that RDVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDVIUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

10.53%

-6.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

23.33%

-12.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

28.54%

-15.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

30.08%

-13.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

32.35%

-15.44%

RDVI vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDVI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDVI vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
RDVI
FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
7.94%8.10%8.62%8.45%1.53%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDVI and USL have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to RDVI (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVI dropped -18.35% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 3-year performance, RDVI leads with 18.62% vs 18.42% for USL. On fees, RDVI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RDVI has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RDVI has performed better with a 18.62% return vs 18.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

RDVI has the higher dividend yield at 7.94%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

RDVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while USL is Oil & Gas. RDVI tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RDVI and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDVI and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer