RDVI vs. AMDW

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RDVI (FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. RDVI is passively managed, while AMDW is actively managed. Over the past year, RDVI returned 30.66% vs 234.24% for AMDW. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RDVI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

RDVI vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVI achieves a 19.32% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 175.61% return.

RDVI

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 3.24%
• 6M: 14.75%
• YTD: 19.32%
• 1Y: 30.66%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.18%

AMDW

• 1D: 9.85%
• 1M: 0.38%
• 6M: 139.25%
• YTD: 175.61%
• 1Y: 234.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 262.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	$10.30M	$9.38M	$8.59M
RDVI FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF	$26.62M	$24.09M	$18.88M

RDVI vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDVI FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF	19.32%	8.55%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	175.61%	36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVI and AMDW is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.43

RDVI vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RDVI	AMDW
Financial Services	38.9%	-
Technology	19.4%	19.3%
Industrials	12.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	-
Healthcare	5.6%	-
Communication Services	4.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	-
Energy	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

RDVI vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RDVI

RDVI Risk / Return Rank: 86
RDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
RDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 89

AMDW

AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 89
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RDVI vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDVI	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.74	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.15	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.39	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	6.81	-3.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.23	13.34	+1.89

RDVI vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVI Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the AMDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVI and AMDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDVI vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVI drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVI and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDVI	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.35%	-34.64%	+16.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.48%	-34.64%	+26.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-12.20%	+12.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.07%	-13.98%	+10.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	17.65%	-15.63%

Volatility

RDVI vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) is 3.65%, while Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) has a volatility of 29.22%. This indicates that RDVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDVI	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	29.22%	-25.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.92%	67.41%	-56.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.99%	86.09%	-72.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.83%	85.21%	-68.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.83%	85.21%	-68.38%

RDVI vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDVI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDVI vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, less than AMDW's 49.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	49.89%	34.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDVI FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF	7.58%	8.10%	8.62%	8.45%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDVI and AMDW in my portfolio?

RDVI and AMDW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDVI or AMDW?

AMDW has higher volatility (29.22%) compared to RDVI (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVI dropped -18.35% vs AMDW's -34.64%.

Which ETF is better, RDVI or AMDW?

On 1-year performance, AMDW leads with 234.24% vs 30.66% for RDVI. On fees, RDVI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RDVI has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDVI or AMDW?

Over the 1-year period, AMDW has performed better with a 234.24% return vs 30.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDVI or AMDW?

RDVI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDVI or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 49.89%, compared with 7.58% for RDVI.

What is the main difference between RDVI and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RDVI and 0.99% for AMDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.