RDTY vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RDTY (YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. RDTY is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, RDTY returned 25.49% vs 23.70% for QYLD. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDTY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

RDTY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTY achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.88% return.

RDTY

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 6M: 13.39%
• 1Y: 25.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	13.72%	10.73%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	13.18%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTY and QYLD is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025	0.64

The correlation between RDTY and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RDTY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTY

RDTY Risk / Return Rank: 48
RDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
RDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
RDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 55

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 89
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RDTY	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.78	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	3.89	-1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.63	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	4.79	-2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.38	28.10	-18.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RDTY vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTY and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RDTY	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	2.78	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.59	+0.34

Drawdowns

RDTY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTY drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTY and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTY	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.31%	-24.75%	+7.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.20%	-4.97%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.06%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.74%	-3.84%	+1.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	0.85%	+1.88%

Volatility

RDTY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.84%. This indicates that RDTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDTY	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	1.84%	+4.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.45%	7.12%	+5.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.98%	8.57%	+8.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.05%	14.70%	+7.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.05%	15.49%	+6.56%

RDTY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDTY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

RDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.97%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	43.97%	36.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTY and QYLD in my portfolio?

RDTY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDTY or QYLD?

RDTY has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to QYLD (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTY dropped -17.31% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, RDTY or QYLD?

On 1-year performance, RDTY leads with 25.49% vs 23.70% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDTY or QYLD?

Over the 1-year period, RDTY has performed better with a 25.49% return vs 23.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTY or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for RDTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTY or QYLD?

RDTY has the higher dividend yield at 43.97%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.

What is the main difference between RDTY and QYLD?

RDTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for RDTY and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.