RDTE vs. YBTC
RDTE (Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while YBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RDTE returned 25.14% vs -38.59% for YBTC. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
RDTE vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than YBTC's -29.91% return.
RDTE
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 25.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBTC
- 1D
- -5.91%
- 1M
- -24.83%
- YTD
- -29.91%
- 6M
- -30.42%
- 1Y
- -38.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDTE vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 9.93% | 9.46% | 8.81% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | -29.91% | -4.23% | 38.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDTE and YBTC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDTE vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank
RDTE
YBTC
RDTE vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDTE | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.83 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | -0.79 | +3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | -1.48 | +11.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDTE | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | -0.98 | +2.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.07 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
RDTE vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, smaller than the maximum YBTC drawdown of -48.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and YBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDTE | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.32% | -48.82% | +24.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -48.82% | +39.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -48.82% | +45.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -13.00% | +8.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 26.03% | -23.39% |
Volatility
RDTE vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) is 5.89%, while Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a volatility of 9.92%. This indicates that RDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDTE | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 9.92% | -4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 31.75% | -18.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.11% | 39.66% | -22.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 40.97% | -21.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 40.97% | -21.64% |
RDTE vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RDTE and YBTC have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
RDTE vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison
RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.59%, less than YBTC's 93.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 46.59% | 50.16% | 10.70% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | 93.82% | 76.04% | 44.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDTE and YBTC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YBTC has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to RDTE (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTE dropped -24.32% vs YBTC's -48.82%.
On 1-year performance, RDTE leads with 25.14% vs -38.59% for YBTC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, RDTE has been the lower-risk option at 5.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RDTE has performed better with a 25.14% return vs -38.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDTE and YBTC have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 93.82%, compared with 46.59% for RDTE.
RDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while YBTC is Cryptocurrency.
RDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDTE and YBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer