PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDTE vs. TSMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDTE vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 18.81% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 37.34% return.


RDTE

1D
1.00%
1M
4.99%
YTD
18.81%
6M
16.28%
1Y
31.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMY

1D
-0.42%
1M
5.31%
YTD
37.34%
6M
39.44%
1Y
76.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTE vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and TSMY is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.48

The correlation between RDTE and TSMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDTE vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTE
RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMY
TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTE vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDTETSMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

4.95

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

17.86

-5.76

RDTE vs. TSMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the TSMY Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTE and TSMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, smaller than the maximum TSMY drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and TSMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDTETSMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.32%

-31.15%

+6.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-15.50%

+6.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.90%

+4.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-5.43%

+0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

4.29%

-1.65%

Volatility

RDTE vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) is 5.84%, while YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) has a volatility of 13.57%. This indicates that RDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDTETSMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

13.57%

-7.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

25.04%

-11.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.23%

31.03%

-13.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.27%

33.89%

-14.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

33.89%

-14.62%

RDTE vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDTE vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.54%, less than TSMY's 52.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
RDTE
Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
44.54%50.16%10.70%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
52.37%56.76%13.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDTE and TSMY have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMY has higher volatility (13.57%) compared to RDTE (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTE dropped -24.32% vs TSMY's -31.15%.

On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 76.34% vs 31.88% for RDTE. On fees, RDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, RDTE has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 76.34% return vs 31.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSMY.

TSMY has the higher dividend yield at 52.37%, compared with 44.54% for RDTE.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RDTE and 0.99% for TSMY.

TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDTE and TSMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer