RDTE vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RDTE (Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RDTE returned 32.40% vs 11.86% for OMAH. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

RDTE vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 5.02% return.

RDTE

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 6.25%
• YTD: 18.03%
• 6M: 15.21%
• 1Y: 32.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 6M: 4.89%
• 1Y: 11.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTE vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	18.03%	14.77%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.02%	6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and OMAH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025	0.53

The correlation between RDTE and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RDTE vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTE

RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 61
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 52
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 52
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 40
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTE vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDTE	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.48	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.08	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.26	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	3.97	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.29	9.48	+2.81

RDTE vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTE and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTE	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.32%	-11.83%	-12.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	-3.00%	-6.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.23%	+2.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-1.27%	-3.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	1.25%	+1.39%

Volatility

RDTE vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 2.23%. This indicates that RDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDTE	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.03%	2.23%	+3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.05%	5.58%	+7.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.26%	8.06%	+9.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.31%	13.05%	+6.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.31%	13.05%	+6.26%

RDTE vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDTE vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.75%, more than OMAH's 15.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.38%	12.86%	0.00%
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	43.75%	50.16%	10.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTE and OMAH in my portfolio?

RDTE and OMAH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDTE or OMAH?

RDTE has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to OMAH (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTE dropped -24.32% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, RDTE or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, RDTE leads with 32.40% vs 11.86% for OMAH. On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDTE or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, RDTE has performed better with a 32.40% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTE or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RDTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTE or OMAH?

RDTE has the higher dividend yield at 43.75%, compared with 15.38% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between RDTE and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RDTE and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.