RDTE vs. QQQ
RDTE (Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. RDTE is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, RDTE returned 29.84% vs 40.74% for QQQ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDTE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
RDTE vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return.
RDTE
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 13.89%
- 6M
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 29.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 40.74%
- 3Y*
- 28.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.86%
- 10Y*
- 21.84%
RDTE vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 13.89% | 9.46% | 8.81% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.71% | 20.77% | 11.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDTE and QQQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between RDTE and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
RDTE vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDTE
QQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
RDTE
QQQ
Basic Materials
RDTE
-
QQQ
Communication Services
RDTE
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
RDTE
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
RDTE
-
QQQ
Energy
RDTE
-
QQQ
Healthcare
RDTE
-
QQQ
Industrials
RDTE
-
QQQ
Real Estate
RDTE
-
QQQ
Technology
RDTE
-
QQQ
Utilities
RDTE
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDTE vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
RDTE
QQQ
RDTE vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDTE | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.44 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 3.42 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 13.14 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDTE | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.57 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.41 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
RDTE vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDTE | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.32% | -82.97% | +58.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -11.96% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.74% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -32.78% | +28.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 3.11% | -0.48% |
Volatility
RDTE vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.51%. This indicates that RDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDTE | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 4.51% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 12.10% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.73% | 15.94% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 22.37% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 22.29% | -3.12% |
RDTE vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDTE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDTE vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.02%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 46.02% | 50.16% | 10.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDTE and QQQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDTE has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to QQQ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTE dropped -24.32% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 40.74% vs 29.84% for RDTE. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 40.74% return vs 29.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RDTE.
RDTE has the higher dividend yield at 46.02%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
RDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RDTE and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDTE and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer