PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDTE vs. EDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDTE vs. EDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than EDF's 13.73% return.


RDTE

1D
-3.48%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
9.93%
6M
8.91%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EDF

1D
-0.37%
1M
3.66%
YTD
13.73%
6M
17.51%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
25.40%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
4.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTE vs. EDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and EDF is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDTE vs. EDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTE
RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EDF
EDF Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDF Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTE vs. EDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDTEEDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.41

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

9.19

+0.36

RDTE vs. EDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the EDF Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTE and EDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDTEEDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.58

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.12

+0.75

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. EDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, smaller than the maximum EDF drawdown of -64.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and EDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDTEEDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.32%

-64.23%

+39.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-9.44%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-6.72%

+3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-21.47%

+16.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.47%

+0.17%

Volatility

RDTE vs. EDF - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) at 4.83%. This indicates that RDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDTEEDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

4.83%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.84%

11.50%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

14.35%

+2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.33%

25.63%

-6.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

30.69%

-11.36%

RDTE vs. EDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than EDF's 1.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDTE vs. EDF - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.59%, more than EDF's 13.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDF
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
13.51%14.49%15.32%16.71%17.31%12.91%16.46%15.67%19.37%13.58%14.75%17.93%
RDTE
Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
46.59%50.16%10.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDTE and EDF have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDTE has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to EDF (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTE dropped -24.32% vs EDF's -64.23%.

EDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDTE and EDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer