RDTE vs. CWII

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RDTE (Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.

Performance

RDTE vs. CWII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly lower than CWII's 13,199.78% return.

RDTE

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 6.25%
• YTD: 18.03%
• 6M: 15.21%
• 1Y: 32.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CWII

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10,273.16%
• YTD: 13,199.78%
• 6M: 11,535.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTE vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	18.03%	-0.65%
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	13,199.78%	-45.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and CWII is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

RDTE vs. CWII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTE

RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 61
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 52
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CWII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTE vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDTE	CWII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.29	—	—

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and CWII.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTE	CWII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.32%	-51.04%	+26.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-33.26%	+28.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RDTE	CWII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.03%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.26%	13,701.30%	-13,684.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.31%	13,701.30%	-13,681.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.31%	13,701.30%	-13,681.99%

RDTE vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDTE vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.75%, less than CWII's 123.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	123.26%	6.09%	0.00%
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	43.75%	50.16%	10.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTE and CWII in my portfolio?

RDTE and CWII have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RDTE or CWII?

On fees, RDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTE or CWII?

RDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTE or CWII?

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 43.75% for RDTE.

What is the main difference between RDTE and CWII?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RDTE and 1.03% for CWII.