RDOG vs. URE
RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) and URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) are both REIT funds - RDOG tracks the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index while URE tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDOG returned 4.49%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for URE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDOG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for URE.
Performance
RDOG vs. URE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly lower than URE's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, RDOG has outperformed URE with an annualized return of 4.49%, while URE has yielded a comparatively lower 3.29% annualized return.
RDOG
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 20.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
URE
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 22.37%
- 1Y
- 11.16%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- -2.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.29%
RDOG vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.52% | 0.95% | 4.57% | 10.38% | -25.53% | 34.42% | -10.01% | 21.54% | -5.70% | 11.84% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 21.30% | -3.65% | 0.35% | 11.58% | -49.64% | 88.24% | -28.06% | 57.86% | -13.80% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDOG and URE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2008 | 0.78 |
The correlation between RDOG and URE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDOG vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank
RDOG
URE
RDOG vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDOG | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.09 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 0.68 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 1.63 | +4.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDOG vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and URE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDOG | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.59% | -97.16% | +29.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -16.50% | +6.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -33.77% | +12.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.52% | -63.66% | +28.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.35% | -70.49% | +21.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -49.63% | +48.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -64.47% | +52.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 6.86% | -3.76% |
Volatility
RDOG vs. URE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) is 4.55%, while ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that RDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDOG | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 10.65% | -6.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 21.26% | -10.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 28.21% | -13.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 37.44% | -17.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.05% | 40.64% | -17.59% |
RDOG vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than URE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDOG vs. URE - Dividend Comparison
RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than URE's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.21% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 1.93% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDOG and URE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URE has higher volatility (10.65%) compared to RDOG (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDOG dropped -67.59% vs URE's -97.16%.
On 10-year performance, RDOG leads with 4.49% vs 3.29% for URE. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDOG has performed better with a 4.49% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.
RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 1.93% for URE.
RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: SS&C and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RDOG and 0.95% for URE.
RDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDOG and URE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer