RDOG vs. RFCI
RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) and RFCI (RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDOG is a REIT fund tracking the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while RFCI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by SS&C. RDOG is passively managed, while RFCI is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDOG returned 4.49%/yr vs 2.08%/yr for RFCI. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDOG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for RFCI.
Performance
RDOG vs. RFCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than RFCI's 0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, RDOG has outperformed RFCI with an annualized return of 4.49%, while RFCI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.08% annualized return.
RDOG
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 20.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
RFCI
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- 2.08%
RDOG vs. RFCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.52% | 0.95% | 4.57% | 10.38% | -25.53% | 34.42% | -10.01% | 21.54% | -5.70% | 11.84% |
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 0.35% | 6.85% | 2.64% | 5.97% | -9.27% | -1.48% | 6.48% | 8.69% | -1.30% | 3.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDOG and RFCI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016 | 0.21 |
The correlation between RDOG and RFCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDOG vs. RFCI — Risk / Return Rank
RDOG
RFCI
RDOG vs. RFCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDOG | RFCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.49 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 4.24 | +2.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDOG vs. RFCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, which is greater than RFCI's maximum drawdown of -14.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and RFCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDOG | RFCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.59% | -14.18% | -53.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -2.65% | -7.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -5.10% | -16.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.52% | -13.46% | -22.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.35% | -14.18% | -35.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -1.16% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -3.22% | -9.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 0.93% | +2.17% |
Volatility
RDOG vs. RFCI - Volatility Comparison
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) at 1.00%. This indicates that RDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDOG | RFCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 1.00% | +3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 2.69% | +8.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 3.52% | +11.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 5.13% | +14.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.05% | 4.94% | +18.11% |
RDOG vs. RFCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RFCI's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDOG vs. RFCI - Dividend Comparison
RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than RFCI's 4.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.21% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.30% | 3.55% | 2.26% | 3.45% | 2.04% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDOG and RFCI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDOG has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to RFCI (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDOG dropped -67.59% vs RFCI's -14.18%.
On 10-year performance, RDOG leads with 4.49% vs 2.08% for RFCI. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RFCI has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDOG has performed better with a 4.49% return vs 2.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for RFCI.
RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 4.55% for RFCI.
RDOG is categorized as REIT, while RFCI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RDOG and 0.54% for RFCI.
RDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDOG and RFCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer