RDOG vs. REIT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) and REIT (ALPS Active REIT ETF) are both REIT funds. RDOG is passively managed, while REIT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RDOG returned 2.58%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for REIT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RDOG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for REIT.

Performance

RDOG vs. REIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RDOG having a 17.52% return and REIT slightly lower at 17.16%.

RDOG

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 2.64%
• YTD: 17.52%
• 6M: 19.48%
• 1Y: 20.13%
• 3Y*: 13.65%
• 5Y*: 2.58%
• 10Y*: 4.49%

REIT

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 17.16%
• 6M: 17.61%
• 1Y: 16.74%
• 3Y*: 12.73%
• 5Y*: 4.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDOG vs. REIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	17.52%	0.95%	4.57%	10.38%	-25.53%	26.31%
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF	17.16%	-0.55%	7.11%	13.74%	-21.23%	33.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RDOG and REIT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2021	0.87

The correlation between RDOG and REIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RDOG vs. REIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDOG

RDOG Risk / Return Rank: 41
RDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
RDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
RDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 37
RDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
RDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

REIT

REIT Risk / Return Rank: 39
REIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
REIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
REIT Omega Ratio Rank: 35
REIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
REIT Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDOG vs. REIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDOG	REIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.26	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	1.71	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.22	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	2.29	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.52	6.59	-0.08

RDOG vs. REIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the REIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDOG and REIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDOG vs. REIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, which is greater than REIT's maximum drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and REIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDOG	REIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.59%	-29.30%	-38.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.02%	-7.35%	-2.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.40%	-18.19%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.52%	-29.30%	-6.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	-0.23%	-0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.23%	-10.28%	-1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	2.54%	+0.56%

Volatility

RDOG vs. REIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) is 4.55%, while ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that RDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDOG	REIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.55%	5.05%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.04%	9.82%	+1.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.91%	13.38%	+1.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.85%	18.51%	+1.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.05%	18.38%	+4.67%

RDOG vs. REIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than REIT's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDOG vs. REIT - Dividend Comparison

RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than REIT's 2.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	6.21%	6.91%	6.11%	7.07%	5.25%	3.11%	5.12%	3.10%	3.13%	3.64%	3.66%	3.43%
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF	2.72%	3.20%	3.06%	3.13%	2.81%	4.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDOG and REIT in my portfolio?

RDOG and REIT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDOG or REIT?

REIT has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to RDOG (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDOG dropped -67.59% vs REIT's -29.30%.

Which ETF is better, RDOG or REIT?

On 5-year performance, REIT leads with 4.91% vs 2.58% for RDOG. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDOG or REIT?

Over the 5-year period, REIT has performed better with a 4.91% return vs 2.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDOG or REIT?

RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for REIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDOG or REIT?

RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 2.72% for REIT.

What is the main difference between RDOG and REIT?

They also come from different issuers: SS&C and ALPS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RDOG and 0.68% for REIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.