RDNT vs. ROAD
RDNT (RadNet, Inc.) and ROAD (Construction Partners, Inc.) are both stocks. RDNT operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while ROAD operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, RDNT returned 11.66%/yr vs 25.21%/yr for ROAD. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RDNT vs. ROAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDNT achieves a -10.61% return, which is significantly lower than ROAD's -4.79% return.
RDNT
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -7.23%
- 6M
- -9.02%
- YTD
- -10.61%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 23.87%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 26.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.27%
ROAD
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- -4.79%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- 51.83%
- 5Y*
- 25.21%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 28.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
RDNT RadNet, Inc. | $37.45M | $46.91M | $51.09M |
| $169.88M | $132.27M | $97.59M |
RDNT vs. ROAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDNT RadNet, Inc. | -10.61% | 2.16% | 100.86% | 84.65% | -37.46% | 53.86% | -3.60% | 99.61% | -25.49% |
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | -4.79% | 22.71% | 103.26% | 63.06% | -9.25% | 1.03% | 72.55% | 91.05% | -32.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDNT and ROAD is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2018 | 0.30 |
The correlation between RDNT and ROAD shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RDNT:
$5.02B
ROAD:
$5.84B
RDNT:
-$0.19
ROAD:
$2.27
RDNT:
2.25
ROAD:
1.78
RDNT:
4.55
ROAD:
5.94
RDNT:
$2.14B
ROAD:
$3.26B
RDNT:
$197.72M
ROAD:
$511.53M
RDNT:
$319.35M
ROAD:
$397.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDNT vs. ROAD — Risk / Return Rank
RDNT
ROAD
RDNT vs. ROAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RadNet, Inc. (RDNT) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDNT | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.05 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 0.07 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.78 | 0.15 | +0.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDNT vs. ROAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDNT drawdown since its inception was -92.15%, which is greater than ROAD's maximum drawdown of -54.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDNT and ROAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDNT | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.15% | -54.54% | -37.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.60% | -33.44% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.84% | -33.62% | -13.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.24% | -54.54% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.16% | -26.43% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.99% | -16.44% | -27.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.19% | 16.36% | +4.83% |
Volatility
RDNT vs. ROAD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RadNet, Inc. (RDNT) is 10.86%, while Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) has a volatility of 12.71%. This indicates that RDNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDNT | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 12.71% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.40% | 39.66% | -7.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.11% | 49.18% | -5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.19% | 45.76% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.31% | 48.79% | -0.48% |
Dividends
RDNT vs. ROAD - Dividend Comparison
Neither RDNT nor ROAD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RDNT vs. ROAD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RadNet, Inc. and Construction Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RDNT vs. ROAD - Profitability Comparison
RDNT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RadNet, Inc. reported a gross profit of -19.85M and revenue of 575.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -3.5%.
ROAD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 98.85M and revenue of 769.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.
RDNT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RadNet, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.85M and revenue of 575.63M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.
ROAD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.38M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
RDNT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RadNet, Inc. reported a net income of -33.47M and revenue of 575.63M, resulting in a net margin of -5.8%.
ROAD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 9.18M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RDNT and ROAD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROAD has higher volatility (12.71%) compared to RDNT (10.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDNT dropped -92.15% vs ROAD's -54.54%.
RDNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDNT and ROAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer