RDIV vs. SOXQ
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RDIV returned 19.79%/yr vs 58.65%/yr for SOXQ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
RDIV vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 93.97% return.
RDIV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 5.90%
- 1M
- 29.63%
- YTD
- 93.97%
- 6M
- 92.43%
- 1Y
- 185.41%
- 3Y*
- 58.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDIV vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 13.43% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | -0.03% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 93.97% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and SOXQ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RDIV and SOXQ has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RDIV vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDIV
SOXQ
Energy
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Energy
RDIV
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
RDIV
SOXQ
Consumer Defensive
RDIV
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
RDIV
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
RDIV
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
RDIV
SOXQ
-
Utilities
RDIV
SOXQ
-
Technology
RDIV
SOXQ
Basic Materials
RDIV
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
RDIV
-
SOXQ
-
Industrials
RDIV
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
SOXQ
RDIV vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDIV | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 5.53 | -3.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.38 | 5.28 | -1.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.73 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.12 | 12.19 | -6.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.06 | 46.84 | -28.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDIV | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 5.53 | -3.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.97 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -46.01% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -15.59% | +10.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -39.36% | +21.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | 0.00% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -12.97% | +7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 4.06% | -2.42% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) is 3.28%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.56%. This indicates that RDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 13.56% | -10.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 26.69% | -18.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 33.79% | -20.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 36.39% | -18.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 36.39% | -14.50% |
RDIV vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDIV vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.61% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.56%) compared to RDIV (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 58.65% vs 19.79% for RDIV. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 58.65% return vs 19.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
RDIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.53 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer