RDIV vs. PEY
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and PEY (Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds from Invesco - RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index while PEY tracks the NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDIV returned 11.03%/yr vs 8.73%/yr for PEY. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for PEY.
Performance
RDIV vs. PEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RDIV having a 13.79% return and PEY slightly higher at 14.10%. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has outperformed PEY with an annualized return of 11.03%, while PEY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.73% annualized return.
RDIV
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 13.59%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
PEY
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- 1Y
- 17.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
RDIV vs. PEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 13.79% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -4.78% | 11.63% |
PEY Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 14.10% | 0.56% | 5.25% | 7.29% | 2.45% | 26.15% | -3.85% | 24.76% | -7.49% | 8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and PEY is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013 | 0.88 |
The correlation between RDIV and PEY shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RDIV vs. PEY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDIV
PEY
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Technology
Utilities
Basic Materials
Industrials
-
Financial Services
RDIV
PEY
Energy
RDIV
PEY
Consumer Cyclical
RDIV
PEY
Consumer Defensive
RDIV
PEY
Communication Services
RDIV
PEY
Real Estate
RDIV
PEY
-
Healthcare
RDIV
PEY
Technology
RDIV
PEY
Utilities
RDIV
PEY
Basic Materials
RDIV
PEY
Industrials
RDIV
-
PEY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. PEY — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
PEY
RDIV vs. PEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDIV | PEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.22 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | 2.00 | +3.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.00 | 5.59 | +11.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. PEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum PEY drawdown of -72.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and PEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | PEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -72.81% | +22.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -8.88% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -17.90% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -17.90% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | -41.55% | -8.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -2.46% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -12.85% | +7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 3.17% | -1.48% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. PEY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) at 4.05%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | PEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 4.05% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.01% | 9.55% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 14.17% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 16.36% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 18.88% | +3.01% |
RDIV vs. PEY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PEY's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDIV vs. PEY - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than PEY's 4.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEY Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 4.49% | 4.85% | 4.44% | 4.58% | 4.22% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.78% | 4.33% | 3.21% | 3.12% | 3.44% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.72% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and PEY have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDIV has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to PEY (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs PEY's -72.81%.
On 10-year performance, RDIV leads with 11.03% vs 8.73% for PEY. On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PEY has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for PEY.
PEY has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 3.72% for RDIV.
RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while PEY tracks NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.54% for PEY.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and PEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer