PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDIV vs. IWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDIV vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 15.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RDIV having a 11.03% annualized return and IWS not far behind at 10.56%.


RDIV

1D
1.18%
1M
0.13%
YTD
13.79%
6M
13.59%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
11.03%

IWS

1D
-1.08%
1M
2.64%
YTD
15.78%
6M
14.47%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDIV vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
13.79%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%11.63%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
15.78%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and IWS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013

0.84

The correlation between RDIV and IWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RDIV vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDIV
IWS

Financial Services

17.8%
13.7%

Energy

17.3%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

15.0%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

14.6%
4.7%

Communication Services

8.8%
3.1%

Real Estate

7.3%
8.3%

Healthcare

6.8%
7.6%

Technology

6.2%
18.7%

Utilities

6.2%
6.6%

Basic Materials

0.5%
5.3%

Industrials

-

16.2%

Financial Services

RDIV
17.8%
IWS
13.7%

Energy

RDIV
17.3%
IWS
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

RDIV
15.0%
IWS
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

RDIV
14.6%
IWS
4.7%

Communication Services

RDIV
8.8%
IWS
3.1%

Real Estate

RDIV
7.3%
IWS
8.3%

Healthcare

RDIV
6.8%
IWS
7.6%

Technology

RDIV
6.2%
IWS
18.7%

Utilities

RDIV
6.2%
IWS
6.6%

Basic Materials

RDIV
0.5%
IWS
5.3%

Industrials

RDIV

-

IWS
16.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDIV vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDIV vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDIVIWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.95

3.57

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.00

13.39

+3.61

RDIV vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the IWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and IWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and IWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDIVIWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-62.40%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

-7.53%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-20.57%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

-21.23%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

-43.83%

-6.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-1.24%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-8.00%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

2.00%

-0.31%

Volatility

RDIV vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDIVIWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.37%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.01%

10.12%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

13.57%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

17.33%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.89%

19.35%

+2.54%

RDIV vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDIV vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than IWS's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.34%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.72%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDIV and IWS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDIV has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to IWS (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs IWS's -62.40%.

On 10-year performance, RDIV leads with 11.03% vs 10.56% for IWS. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 1.34% for IWS.

RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.23% for IWS.

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDIV and IWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer