RDIV vs. DIV
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index while DIV tracks the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDIV returned 11.03%/yr vs 4.14%/yr for DIV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
RDIV vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RDIV having a 13.79% return and DIV slightly lower at 13.39%. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 11.03%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.14% annualized return.
RDIV
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 13.59%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
DIV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
RDIV vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 13.79% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -4.78% | 11.63% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 13.39% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and DIV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013 | 0.81 |
The correlation between RDIV and DIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RDIV vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDIV
DIV
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Industrials
-
Financial Services
RDIV
DIV
Energy
RDIV
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
RDIV
DIV
Consumer Defensive
RDIV
DIV
Communication Services
RDIV
DIV
Real Estate
RDIV
DIV
Healthcare
RDIV
DIV
Technology
RDIV
DIV
-
Utilities
RDIV
DIV
Basic Materials
RDIV
DIV
Industrials
RDIV
-
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
DIV
RDIV vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDIV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.25 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | 2.98 | +2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.00 | 8.09 | +8.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -52.74% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -5.23% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -12.33% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -21.14% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | -52.74% | +2.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -1.67% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -7.01% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.92% | -0.23% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.68%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 3.68% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.01% | 7.54% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 10.64% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 13.69% | +3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 18.00% | +3.89% |
RDIV vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDIV vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than DIV's 6.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.77% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.72% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and DIV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDIV has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to DIV (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, RDIV leads with 11.03% vs 4.14% for DIV. On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 3.72% for RDIV.
RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.45% for DIV.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer