RDFI vs. DBO
RDFI (Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RDFI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Rareview Funds, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. RDFI is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RDFI returned 2.86%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for DBO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDFI charges 3.69%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
RDFI vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDFI achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 80.66% return.
RDFI
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 9.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 80.66%
- 6M
- 78.46%
- 1Y
- 78.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
RDFI vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 1.84% | 9.83% | 13.15% | 8.57% | -17.06% | 12.51% | 8.65% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 80.66% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | 18.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDFI and DBO is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020 | 0.04 |
The correlation between RDFI and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RDFI vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDFI
DBO
Financial Services
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
RDFI
DBO
Energy
RDFI
DBO
-
Utilities
RDFI
DBO
-
Real Estate
RDFI
DBO
-
Industrials
RDFI
DBO
-
Technology
RDFI
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
RDFI
DBO
-
Basic Materials
RDFI
DBO
-
Communication Services
RDFI
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
RDFI
DBO
-
Healthcare
RDFI
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDFI vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
RDFI
DBO
RDFI vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDFI | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 2.28 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 2.88 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.37 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 4.62 | -3.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | 9.43 | -4.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDFI | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.28 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.49 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.02 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
RDFI vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDFI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDFI and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDFI | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.71% | -90.18% | +66.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.01% | -18.19% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.41% | -28.20% | +17.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.71% | -37.68% | +13.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -52.46% | +49.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -62.25% | +55.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 8.92% | -6.83% |
Volatility
RDFI vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) is 2.42%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that RDFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDFI | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 13.25% | -10.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.23% | 28.15% | -21.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.02% | 34.54% | -27.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.15% | 32.28% | -24.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.96% | 31.78% | -23.82% |
RDFI vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDFI has a 3.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDFI vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
RDFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, more than DBO's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.94% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 8.98% | 8.17% | 8.14% | 7.38% | 4.70% | 6.78% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDFI and DBO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to RDFI (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDFI dropped -23.71% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.57% vs 2.86% for RDFI. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, RDFI has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 3.69% for RDFI.
RDFI has the higher dividend yield at 8.98%, compared with 1.94% for DBO.
RDFI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Rareview Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 3.69% for RDFI and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDFI and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer