RCTR vs. TDIV
RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RCTR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RCTR returned 9.71% vs 25.59% for TDIV. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RCTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.
Performance
RCTR vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 14.88% return.
RCTR
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- 6M
- -9.50%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 9.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.30%
TDIV
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 12.66%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 15.93%
- 10Y*
- 17.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $83.08K | $122.59K | $254.75K | |
| $13.49M | $14.96M | $15.07M |
RCTR vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | 0.61% | 6.65% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 14.88% | 6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCTR and TDIV is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.63 |
The correlation between RCTR and TDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCTR vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank
RCTR
TDIV
RCTR vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCTR | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.20 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.47 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 4.06 | -3.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCTR vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and TDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCTR | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.98% | -31.97% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.98% | -16.34% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.26% | -13.59% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -4.92% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.86% | 5.89% | +1.97% |
Volatility
RCTR vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) at 5.94%. This indicates that RCTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCTR | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.98% | 5.94% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.49% | 16.32% | +4.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.82% | 20.70% | +6.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 21.11% | +5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 20.99% | +5.83% |
RCTR vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCTR vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison
RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than TDIV's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | 0.64% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.37% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCTR and TDIV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCTR has higher volatility (7.98%) compared to TDIV (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCTR dropped -18.98% vs TDIV's -31.97%.
On 1-year performance, TDIV leads with 25.59% vs 9.71% for RCTR. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDIV has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 25.59% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for RCTR.
TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.64% for RCTR.
RCTR is categorized as Energy Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. RCTR tracks Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.50% for TDIV.
TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCTR and TDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer