RCTR vs. QCLN
RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RCTR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RCTR returned 9.71% vs 41.09% for QCLN. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RCTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QCLN.
Performance
RCTR vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 10.48% return.
RCTR
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- 6M
- -9.50%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 9.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.30%
QCLN
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -13.14%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 41.09%
- 3Y*
- -2.29%
- 5Y*
- -5.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.39M | $13.63M | $14.46M | |
| $83.08K | $122.59K | $254.75K |
RCTR vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | 0.61% | 6.65% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 10.48% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCTR and QCLN is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.70 |
The correlation between RCTR and QCLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCTR vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank
RCTR
QCLN
RCTR vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCTR | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.18 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.25 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 4.64 | -3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCTR vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and QCLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCTR | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.98% | -76.18% | +57.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.98% | -32.12% | +13.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.26% | -42.92% | +26.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -43.36% | +37.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.86% | 8.62% | -0.76% |
Volatility
RCTR vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) is 7.98%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that RCTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCTR | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.98% | 15.14% | -7.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.49% | 33.63% | -13.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.82% | 40.58% | -13.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 38.97% | -12.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 35.54% | -8.72% |
RCTR vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCTR vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison
RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than QCLN's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | 0.64% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCTR and QCLN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCLN has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to RCTR (7.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCTR dropped -18.98% vs QCLN's -76.18%.
On 1-year performance, QCLN leads with 41.09% vs 9.71% for RCTR. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, RCTR has been the lower-risk option at 7.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QCLN has performed better with a 41.09% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QCLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for RCTR.
RCTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.17% for QCLN.
RCTR is categorized as Energy Equities, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. RCTR tracks Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while QCLN tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.59% for QCLN.
QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCTR and QCLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer