RCTR vs. QCLN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RCTR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RCTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.

Performance

RCTR vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 52.00% return.

RCTR

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -6.46%
• YTD: 8.96%
• 6M: 4.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCLN

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 13.54%
• YTD: 52.00%
• 6M: 46.53%
• 1Y: 117.87%
• 3Y*: 12.00%
• 5Y*: 2.04%
• 10Y*: 17.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCTR vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	8.96%	7.23%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	52.00%	26.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RCTR and QCLN is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

RCTR vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 89
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 80
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCTR vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCTR	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.20	+0.56

Drawdowns

RCTR vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -14.66%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCTR	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.66%	-76.18%	+61.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.86%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-69.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-71.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.31%	-21.47%	+12.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-43.44%	+38.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.59%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RCTR	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	26.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.62%	34.68%	-8.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.62%	37.96%	-11.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.62%	34.90%	-8.28%

RCTR vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCTR vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, more than QCLN's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.15%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	0.41%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCTR and QCLN in my portfolio?

RCTR and QCLN have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCTR or QCLN?

On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCTR or QCLN?

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for RCTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCTR or QCLN?

RCTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.

What is the main difference between RCTR and QCLN?

RCTR is categorized as Energy Equities, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. RCTR tracks Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while QCLN tracks NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.60% for QCLN.