RCTR vs. OIH

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) and OIH (VanEck Oil Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - RCTR tracks the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index while OIH tracks the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RCTR returned 9.71% vs 66.58% for OIH. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RCTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for OIH.

Performance

RCTR vs. OIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than OIH's 35.13% return.

RCTR

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -2.79%
• 6M: -9.50%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 1Y: 9.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.30%

OIH

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: 7.01%
• 6M: 10.45%
• YTD: 35.13%
• 1Y: 66.58%
• 3Y*: 5.85%
• 5Y*: 16.72%
• 10Y*: -1.73%
• ALL TIME*: -0.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF	$98.54M	$112.94M	$141.52M
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	$83.08K	$122.59K	$254.75K

RCTR vs. OIH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	0.61%	6.65%
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF	35.13%	16.66%

Correlation

The correlation between RCTR and OIH is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

RCTR vs. OIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RCTR

RCTR Risk / Return Rank: 18
RCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
RCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
RCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 17
RCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
RCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 18

OIH

OIH Risk / Return Rank: 80
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 79
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RCTR vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RCTR	OIH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	2.06	-1.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	2.68	-2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.33	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	2.93	-2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.00	9.02	-8.01

RCTR vs. OIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the OIH Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCTR and OIH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RCTR vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, smaller than the maximum OIH drawdown of -94.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and OIH.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCTR	OIH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.98%	-94.45%	+75.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.98%	-20.78%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-43.80%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.80%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.26%	-65.73%	+49.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.09%	-48.94%	+42.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.86%	6.76%	+1.10%

Volatility

RCTR vs. OIH - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) have volatilities of 7.98% and 7.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCTR	OIH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.98%	7.91%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.49%	20.95%	-0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.82%	29.63%	-2.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.82%	36.46%	-9.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.82%	42.30%	-15.48%

RCTR vs. OIH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than OIH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCTR vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison

RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than OIH's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF	1.27%	1.71%	2.01%	1.36%	0.95%	0.98%	1.23%	2.10%	2.13%	2.60%	1.40%	2.39%
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	0.64%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCTR and OIH in my portfolio?

RCTR and OIH have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RCTR or OIH?

RCTR has higher volatility (7.98%) compared to OIH (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCTR dropped -18.98% vs OIH's -94.45%.

Which ETF is better, RCTR or OIH?

On 1-year performance, OIH leads with 66.58% vs 9.71% for RCTR. On fees, OIH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RCTR or OIH?

Over the 1-year period, OIH has performed better with a 66.58% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCTR or OIH?

OIH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for RCTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCTR or OIH?

OIH has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.64% for RCTR.

What is the main difference between RCTR and OIH?

RCTR tracks Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.35% for OIH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.