RCTR vs. IGLD
RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) and IGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCTR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while IGLD is a Gold fund actively managed by First Trust. RCTR is passively managed, while IGLD is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IGLD.
Performance
RCTR vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's -5.84% return.
RCTR
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -4.82%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGLD
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- 6M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -5.84%
- 1Y
- 15.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
RCTR vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | 3.29% | 6.65% |
IGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | -5.84% | 24.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCTR and IGLD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCTR vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank
RCTR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IGLD
RCTR vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCTR | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCTR vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -16.86%, smaller than the maximum IGLD drawdown of -23.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and IGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCTR | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.86% | -23.84% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.03% | -21.44% | +7.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -5.52% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.06% | — |
Volatility
RCTR vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCTR | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.75% | 24.75% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.75% | 15.61% | +11.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.75% | 15.38% | +11.37% |
RCTR vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCTR vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison
RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than IGLD's 21.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 21.17% | 9.91% | 20.81% | 7.85% | 4.45% | 2.24% |
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | 0.63% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCTR and IGLD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RCTR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RCTR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.
IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 21.17%, compared with 0.63% for RCTR.
RCTR is categorized as Energy Equities, while IGLD is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.85% for IGLD.
Find the right allocation for RCTR and IGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer