RCTIX vs. FFRHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RCTIX (River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund) and FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both mutual funds - RCTIX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by River Canyon, while FFRHX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, RCTIX returned 5.54%/yr vs 4.95%/yr for FFRHX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCTIX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FFRHX.

Performance

RCTIX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCTIX achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than FFRHX's 2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, RCTIX has outperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 5.54%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.95% annualized return.

RCTIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: 5.24%
• 3Y*: 7.47%
• 5Y*: 4.38%
• 10Y*: 5.54%

FFRHX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: 4.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCTIX vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund	0.71%	7.75%	7.49%	10.02%	-4.07%	4.26%	6.42%	11.71%	1.82%	9.76%
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	2.05%	5.47%	7.10%	12.63%	-1.55%	5.01%	1.69%	8.63%	0.10%	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RCTIX and FFRHX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.13

Return for Risk

RCTIX vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCTIX

RCTIX Risk / Return Rank: 74
RCTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
RCTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
RCTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
RCTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RCTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FFRHX

FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCTIX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RCTIX	FFRHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.62	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	6.30	-2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.96	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.39	5.16	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.63	18.28	-3.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RCTIX vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCTIX and FFRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCTIX	FFRHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.62	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.77	1.92	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.49	1.20	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	1.15	+0.16

Drawdowns

RCTIX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCTIX drawdown since its inception was -10.89%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTIX and FFRHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCTIX	FFRHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.89%	-22.20%	+11.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.20%	-1.19%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.48%	-3.29%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.17%	-5.90%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.89%	-22.20%	+11.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.11%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-1.15%	+0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	0.34%	+0.02%

Volatility

RCTIX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.61%. This indicates that RCTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCTIX	FFRHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	0.61%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.76%	1.62%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28%	2.35%	-0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.49%	2.88%	-0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.74%	4.14%	-0.40%

RCTIX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCTIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCTIX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

RCTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than FFRHX's 7.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	7.07%	7.41%	6.94%	8.24%	3.81%	2.74%	3.84%	5.15%	4.74%	4.05%	4.44%	3.69%
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund	7.27%	7.31%	7.89%	8.50%	5.98%	3.02%	5.97%	4.97%	3.30%	4.89%	2.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCTIX and FFRHX in my portfolio?

RCTIX and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RCTIX or FFRHX?

RCTIX has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to FFRHX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCTIX dropped -10.89% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.