PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FFRHX vs. FTBFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FFRHX and FTBFX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

FFRHX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.06%
1.72%
FFRHX
FTBFX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FFRHX:

4.11

FTBFX:

0.87

Sortino Ratio

FFRHX:

13.83

FTBFX:

1.27

Omega Ratio

FFRHX:

4.25

FTBFX:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

FFRHX:

13.59

FTBFX:

0.51

Martin Ratio

FFRHX:

69.80

FTBFX:

2.51

Ulcer Index

FFRHX:

0.17%

FTBFX:

1.84%

Daily Std Dev

FFRHX:

2.84%

FTBFX:

5.30%

Max Drawdown

FFRHX:

-22.19%

FTBFX:

-17.80%

Current Drawdown

FFRHX:

-0.11%

FTBFX:

-3.25%

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FFRHX has outperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 5.58%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.15% annualized return.


FFRHX

YTD

0.00%

1M

0.66%

6M

6.06%

1Y

11.74%

5Y*

6.76%

10Y*

5.58%

FTBFX

YTD

-0.11%

1M

0.04%

6M

1.72%

1Y

4.83%

5Y*

0.74%

10Y*

2.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFRHX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFRHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.


FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
Expense ratio chart for FFRHX: current value at 0.67% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.67%
Expense ratio chart for FTBFX: current value at 0.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.45%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFRHX vs. FTBFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFRHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFRHX is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FTBFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTBFX is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTBFX is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTBFX is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTBFX is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTBFX is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTBFX is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FFRHX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 4.11, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.004.110.91
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 13.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0013.831.33
The chart of Omega ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 4.25, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.004.251.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 13.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0013.590.54
The chart of Martin ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 69.80, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0069.802.63
FFRHX
FTBFX

The current FFRHX Sharpe Ratio is 4.11, which is higher than the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFRHX and FTBFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.11
0.91
FFRHX
FTBFX

Dividends

FFRHX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

FFRHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.06%, more than FTBFX's 5.51% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
11.06%11.06%10.34%6.41%3.27%3.85%5.17%5.50%4.01%3.94%4.25%4.00%
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
5.51%5.50%5.19%4.18%2.19%2.53%2.95%3.65%2.74%2.95%3.71%2.99%

Drawdowns

FFRHX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFRHX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -17.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRHX and FTBFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.11%
-3.25%
FFRHX
FTBFX

Volatility

FFRHX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) is 0.75%, while Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) has a volatility of 1.49%. This indicates that FFRHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.75%
1.49%
FFRHX
FTBFX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab