RCS vs. UTBPX
RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) and UTBPX (UBS Multi Income Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, RCS returned 2.85%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for UTBPX. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RCS vs. UTBPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCS achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly lower than UTBPX's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RCS has outperformed UTBPX with an annualized return of 2.85%, while UTBPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.74% annualized return.
RCS
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- -19.96%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.17%
UTBPX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 2.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $707.45K | $672.81K | $742.33K | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RCS vs. UTBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | -0.92% | -21.48% | 37.47% | 37.60% | -18.72% | 6.33% | -16.19% | 1.62% | 15.51% | 14.39% |
UTBPX UBS Multi Income Bond Fund | -0.18% | 6.60% | 1.67% | 6.67% | -11.74% | -1.49% | 6.51% | 10.62% | -2.08% | 4.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCS and UTBPX is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCS vs. UTBPX — Risk / Return Rank
RCS
UTBPX
RCS vs. UTBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) and UBS Multi Income Bond Fund (UTBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCS | UTBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.17 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 1.23 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 4.21 | -5.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCS vs. UTBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCS drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than UTBPX's maximum drawdown of -16.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCS and UTBPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCS | UTBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -16.84% | -29.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.94% | -2.98% | -29.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.94% | -4.35% | -28.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.18% | -16.75% | -19.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | -16.84% | -29.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.32% | -1.90% | -27.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -3.98% | -5.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.75% | 0.87% | +20.88% |
Volatility
RCS vs. UTBPX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to UBS Multi Income Bond Fund (UTBPX) at 1.19%. This indicates that RCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCS | UTBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 1.19% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.51% | 3.32% | +13.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.32% | 3.97% | +20.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 4.90% | +20.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.81% | 4.37% | +21.44% |
Dividends
RCS vs. UTBPX - Dividend Comparison
RCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than UTBPX's 4.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | 9.14% | 8.62% | 8.03% | 10.07% | 12.39% | 9.01% | 9.57% | 8.44% | 8.93% | 9.50% | 10.92% | 11.17% |
UTBPX UBS Multi Income Bond Fund | 4.32% | 4.18% | 4.53% | 3.54% | 2.84% | 1.89% | 2.11% | 2.80% | 3.05% | 2.46% | 1.68% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCS and UTBPX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCS has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to UTBPX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCS dropped -46.69% vs UTBPX's -16.84%.
UTBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCS and UTBPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer