RCS vs. RCPIX
RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) and RCPIX (RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, RCS returned 6.69%/yr vs 6.10%/yr for RCPIX. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RCS vs. RCPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCS achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly higher than RCPIX's -1.23% return.
RCS
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- -19.96%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.17%
RCPIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- 6M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 1Y
- 2.33%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $707.45K | $672.81K | $742.33K |
RCS vs. RCPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | -0.92% | -21.48% | 37.47% | 37.60% | -18.72% | -5.95% |
RCPIX RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund | -1.23% | 8.16% | 5.97% | 9.64% | -13.59% | -0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCS and RCPIX is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCS vs. RCPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RCS
RCPIX
RCS vs. RCPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) and RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund (RCPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCS | RCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.15 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 0.95 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 2.20 | -3.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCS vs. RCPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCS drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than RCPIX's maximum drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCS and RCPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCS | RCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -18.89% | -27.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.94% | -3.46% | -29.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.94% | -4.60% | -28.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.32% | -3.27% | -26.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -5.80% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.75% | 1.48% | +20.27% |
Volatility
RCS vs. RCPIX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund (RCPIX) at 1.00%. This indicates that RCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCS | RCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 1.00% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.51% | 3.06% | +13.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.32% | 3.85% | +20.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 5.60% | +19.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.81% | 5.60% | +20.21% |
Dividends
RCS vs. RCPIX - Dividend Comparison
RCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than RCPIX's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCPIX RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund | 5.05% | 4.95% | 4.37% | 4.34% | 3.77% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | 9.14% | 8.62% | 8.03% | 10.07% | 12.39% | 9.01% | 9.57% | 8.44% | 8.93% | 9.50% | 10.92% | 11.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCS and RCPIX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCS has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to RCPIX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCS dropped -46.69% vs RCPIX's -18.89%.
RCPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCS and RCPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer