RCS vs. PFORX
RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) and PFORX (PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)) are both mutual funds - RCS is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by PIMCO, while PFORX is a Global Bonds fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, RCS returned 2.85%/yr vs 2.58%/yr for PFORX. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RCS vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCS achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly lower than PFORX's -0.68% return. Over the past 10 years, RCS has outperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 2.85%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.58% annualized return.
RCS
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- -19.96%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.17%
PFORX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 1.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $707.45K | $672.81K | $742.33K |
RCS vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | -0.92% | -21.48% | 37.47% | 37.60% | -18.72% | 6.33% | -16.19% | 1.62% | 15.51% | 14.39% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | -0.68% | 4.33% | 5.70% | 9.52% | -10.33% | -1.67% | 6.17% | 7.64% | 2.64% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCS and PFORX is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCS vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank
RCS
PFORX
RCS vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCS | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.07 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 0.33 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 0.91 | -1.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCS vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCS drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCS and PFORX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCS | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -13.87% | -32.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.94% | -3.99% | -28.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.94% | -3.99% | -28.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.18% | -13.71% | -22.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | -13.87% | -32.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.32% | -2.16% | -27.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -1.95% | -7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.75% | 1.43% | +20.32% |
Volatility
RCS vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) at 1.01%. This indicates that RCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCS | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 1.01% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.51% | 3.48% | +13.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.32% | 3.88% | +20.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 3.65% | +21.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.81% | 3.16% | +22.65% |
Dividends
RCS vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison
RCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than PFORX's 3.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 3.72% | 4.23% | 4.91% | 3.02% | 3.65% | 1.55% | 2.46% | 6.86% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 9.12% |
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | 9.14% | 8.62% | 8.03% | 10.07% | 12.39% | 9.01% | 9.57% | 8.44% | 8.93% | 9.50% | 10.92% | 11.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCS and PFORX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCS has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to PFORX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCS dropped -46.69% vs PFORX's -13.87%.
PFORX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCS and PFORX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer