RCS vs. BCPIX
RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) and BCPIX (Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, RCS returned 2.85%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for BCPIX. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RCS vs. BCPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCS achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly lower than BCPIX's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, RCS has outperformed BCPIX with an annualized return of 2.85%, while BCPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.52% annualized return.
RCS
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- -19.96%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.17%
BCPIX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 1Y
- 1.48%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- 0.32%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $707.45K | $672.81K | $742.33K |
RCS vs. BCPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | -0.92% | -21.48% | 37.47% | 37.60% | -18.72% | 6.33% | -16.19% | 1.62% | 15.51% | 14.39% |
BCPIX Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund | -0.77% | 6.71% | 1.98% | 6.70% | -10.78% | -0.34% | 5.77% | 6.65% | -0.45% | 2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCS and BCPIX is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2007 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCS vs. BCPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RCS
BCPIX
RCS vs. BCPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) and Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCS | BCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.11 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 0.84 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 2.29 | -3.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCS vs. BCPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCS drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than BCPIX's maximum drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCS and BCPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCS | BCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -22.43% | -24.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.94% | -2.63% | -30.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.94% | -4.70% | -28.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.18% | -15.02% | -21.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | -15.19% | -31.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.32% | -1.97% | -27.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -4.23% | -5.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.75% | 0.96% | +20.79% |
Volatility
RCS vs. BCPIX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX) at 0.95%. This indicates that RCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCS | BCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 0.95% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.51% | 2.80% | +13.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.32% | 3.50% | +20.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 5.11% | +20.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.81% | 4.18% | +21.63% |
Dividends
RCS vs. BCPIX - Dividend Comparison
RCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than BCPIX's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPIX Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund | 3.95% | 4.32% | 3.67% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 1.89% | 1.76% | 2.77% | 2.90% | 2.49% | 2.84% | 2.72% |
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | 9.14% | 8.62% | 8.03% | 10.07% | 12.39% | 9.01% | 9.57% | 8.44% | 8.93% | 9.50% | 10.92% | 11.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCS and BCPIX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCS has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to BCPIX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCS dropped -46.69% vs BCPIX's -22.43%.
BCPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCS and BCPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer