RCPIX vs. RCS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

RCPIX (RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund) and RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, RCPIX returned 7.01%/yr vs 7.02%/yr for RCS. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RCPIX vs. RCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund (RCPIX) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCPIX achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly higher than RCS's -0.54% return.

RCPIX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.42%
• 6M: -0.44%
• YTD: -0.22%
• 1Y: 5.10%
• 3Y*: 7.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RCS

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -2.76%
• 6M: -11.50%
• YTD: -0.54%
• 1Y: -19.55%
• 3Y*: 7.02%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: 2.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCPIX vs. RCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RCPIX RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund	-0.22%	8.16%	5.97%	9.64%	-13.59%	-0.20%
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund	-0.54%	-21.48%	37.47%	37.60%	-18.72%	-5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RCPIX and RCS is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021	0.21

The correlation between RCPIX and RCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RCPIX vs. RCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCPIX

RCPIX Risk / Return Rank: 28
RCPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
RCPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
RCPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
RCPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
RCPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

RCS

RCS Risk / Return Rank: 1
RCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
RCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
RCS Omega Ratio Rank: 1
RCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
RCS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCPIX vs. RCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund (RCPIX) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RCPIX	RCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	-0.81	+2.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	-1.06	+2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.87	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	-0.60	+1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.62	-0.96	+4.57

RCPIX vs. RCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the RCS Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCPIX and RCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RCPIX vs. RCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCPIX drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, smaller than the maximum RCS drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCPIX and RCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCPIX	RCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.89%	-46.69%	+27.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.46%	-32.94%	+29.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.15%	-32.94%	+27.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.29%	-29.05%	+26.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-9.44%	+3.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.32%	20.48%	-19.16%

Volatility

RCPIX vs. RCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund (RCPIX) is 1.05%, while PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that RCPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCPIX	RCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	5.49%	-4.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.06%	17.01%	-13.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.86%	24.23%	-20.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.62%	25.23%	-19.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.62%	25.84%	-20.22%

Dividends

RCPIX vs. RCS - Dividend Comparison

RCPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, less than RCS's 9.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RCPIX RBC BlueBay Core Plus Bond Fund	6.00%	4.95%	4.37%	4.34%	3.77%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund	9.11%	8.62%	8.03%	10.07%	12.39%	9.01%	9.57%	8.44%	8.93%	9.50%	10.92%	11.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCPIX and RCS in my portfolio?

RCPIX and RCS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RCPIX or RCS?

RCS has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to RCPIX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCPIX dropped -18.89% vs RCS's -46.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RCPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.