PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RCL vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RCL vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCL achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, RCL has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 15.25%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.


RCL

1D
-2.86%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
-1.45%
6M
9.27%
1Y
0.11%
3Y*
45.28%
5Y*
24.69%
10Y*
15.25%

VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCL vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
-1.45%22.46%78.98%161.97%-35.72%2.96%-43.50%39.94%-16.13%48.22%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RCL and VEA is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.53

The correlation between RCL and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RCL vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCL
RCL Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
RCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
RCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCL Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCL vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RCLVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.32

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

2.42

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.01

9.39

-9.38

RCL vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCL and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RCLVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

1.75

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.55

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.59

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.24

+0.02

Drawdowns

RCL vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCL drawdown since its inception was -89.49%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCL and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RCLVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.49%

-60.68%

-28.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.36%

-11.63%

-20.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.02%

-13.45%

-21.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.64%

-29.71%

-37.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.30%

-35.73%

-47.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.38%

-3.40%

-20.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.77%

-13.29%

-14.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.98%

3.00%

+15.98%

Volatility

RCL vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) has a higher volatility of 12.07% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 6.03%. This indicates that RCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RCLVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.07%

6.03%

+6.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.21%

13.91%

+23.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.63%

16.15%

+29.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.38%

16.63%

+31.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.29%

17.40%

+35.89%

Dividends

RCL vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

RCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than VEA's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
1.84%1.25%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.04%2.22%2.66%1.81%2.08%1.33%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


RCL and VEA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RCL has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCL dropped -89.49% vs VEA's -60.68%.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCL and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer