RCL vs. NUKZ
RCL (Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.) is a stock, while NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Over the past year, RCL returned -16.87% vs 5.48% for NUKZ. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RCL vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCL achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly higher than NUKZ's -1.84% return.
RCL
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- -16.87%
- 3Y*
- 42.18%
- 5Y*
- 30.12%
- 10Y*
- 15.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.50%
NUKZ
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -11.94%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 43.65%
RCL vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RCL Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | 3.68% | 22.46% | 85.12% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | -1.84% | 56.57% | 60.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCL and NUKZ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCL vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
RCL
NUKZ
RCL vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.05 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 0.30 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 0.70 | -1.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCL vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCL drawdown since its inception was -89.49%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCL and NUKZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.49% | -33.03% | -56.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.36% | -18.23% | -14.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.44% | -18.23% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.73% | -6.30% | -21.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.85% | 7.83% | +12.02% |
Volatility
RCL vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 6.47%. This indicates that RCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 6.47% | +3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.58% | 23.01% | +14.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.08% | 30.55% | +16.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.39% | 32.65% | +15.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.32% | 32.65% | +20.67% |
Dividends
RCL vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
RCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than NUKZ's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.93% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RCL Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | 1.75% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 2.22% | 2.66% | 1.81% | 2.08% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCL and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCL has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to NUKZ (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCL dropped -89.49% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.
NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCL and NUKZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer