PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RBTX.L vs. TER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RBTX.L vs. TER

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

RBTX.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) is Robotics fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while TER (Teradyne, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, RBTX.L returned 12.03%/yr vs 29.08%/yr for TER. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RBTX.L vs. TER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RBTX.L is traded in GBp, while TER is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TER values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBTX.L achieves a 32.14% return, which is significantly lower than TER's 124.56% return.

RBTX.L

1D
3.16%
1M
8.29%
YTD
32.14%
6M
32.00%
1Y
50.78%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
—

TER

1D
7.17%
1M
27.16%
YTD
124.56%
6M
121.65%
1Y
427.95%
3Y*
55.58%
5Y*
29.08%
10Y*
38.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBTX.L vs. TER - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBTX.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF		32.14%9.17%7.51%32.05%-26.55%22.26%35.08%32.52%-13.97%34.09%
TER
Teradyne, Inc.		124.56%43.39%18.55%18.54%-39.97%38.10%71.54%110.60%-19.89%51.79%

Correlation

The correlation between RBTX.L and TER is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016

0.49

The correlation between RBTX.L and TER has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF

Teradyne, Inc.

Often compared with RBTX.L:
RBTX.L vs. BOTZRBTX.L vs. AIAG.LRBTX.L vs. IITU.LRBTX.L vs. INTL.LRBTX.L vs. ROBG.LRBTX.L vs. VOORBTX.L vs. RBOD.L
Often compared with TER:
TER vs. AEHRTER vs. SNPSTER vs. AMATTER vs. VGTTER vs. BWXTTER vs. PLABTER vs. CDNS

Return for Risk

RBTX.L vs. TER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RBTX.L
RBTX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
TER
TER Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TER Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TER Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TER Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TER Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBTX.L vs. TER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RBTX.LTERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.30
6.50

-4.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.18
4.90

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.71

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

16.32

-12.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

60.03

-48.74

RBTX.L vs. TER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is lower than the TER Sharpe Ratio of 6.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBTX.L and TER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBTX.L vs. TER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBTX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum TER drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBTX.L and TER.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RBTX.LTERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-77.09%

+43.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-26.44%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.28%

-58.34%

+31.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.46%

-58.34%

+24.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-58.34%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-19.33%

+9.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

7.17%

-2.69%

Volatility

RBTX.L vs. TER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) is 9.28%, while Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a volatility of 25.23%. This indicates that RBTX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RBTX.LTERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.28%

25.23%

-15.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.74%

51.85%

-34.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.02%

66.47%

-44.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

48.95%

-23.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.51%

44.59%

-20.08%

Dividends

RBTX.L vs. TER - Dividend Comparison

RBTX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RBTX.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TER
Teradyne, Inc.		0.12%0.25%0.38%0.41%0.50%0.24%0.33%0.53%1.15%0.67%0.94%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

RBTX.L and TER have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBTX.L and TER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer