PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RBTX.L vs. EIMI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RBTX.L vs. EIMI.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RBTX.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) and EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBTX.L is a Robotics fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBTX.L returned 11.91%/yr vs 8.77%/yr for EIMI.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RBTX.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EIMI.L.

Performance

RBTX.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RBTX.L is traded in GBp, while EIMI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EIMI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBTX.L achieves a 29.04% return, which is significantly higher than EIMI.L's 24.75% return.

RBTX.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
9.00%
YTD
29.04%
6M
26.25%
1Y
47.66%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
—

EIMI.L

1D
-1.30%
1M
5.47%
YTD
24.75%
6M
26.33%
1Y
50.86%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBTX.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBTX.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF		29.04%9.17%7.51%32.05%-26.55%22.26%35.08%32.52%-13.97%34.09%
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF		24.75%22.75%9.23%5.48%-10.12%0.29%15.31%11.94%-9.08%25.11%

Correlation

The correlation between RBTX.L and EIMI.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016

0.69

The correlation between RBTX.L and EIMI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

RBTX.L vs. EIMI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RBTX.L
EIMI.L

Technology

73.2%
35.0%

Industrials

25.1%
8.9%

Healthcare

1.6%
3.7%

Basic Materials

0.1%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
9.6%

Communication Services

-

6.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.3%

Energy

-

3.9%

Financial Services

-

18.4%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Technology

RBTX.L
73.2%
EIMI.L
35.0%

Industrials

RBTX.L
25.1%
EIMI.L
8.9%

Healthcare

RBTX.L
1.6%
EIMI.L
3.7%

Basic Materials

RBTX.L
0.1%
EIMI.L
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RBTX.L
0.1%
EIMI.L
9.6%

Communication Services

RBTX.L

-

EIMI.L
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

RBTX.L

-

EIMI.L
3.3%

Energy

RBTX.L

-

EIMI.L
3.9%

Financial Services

RBTX.L

-

EIMI.L
18.4%

Real Estate

RBTX.L

-

EIMI.L
1.7%

Utilities

RBTX.L

-

EIMI.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF

iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF

Often compared with RBTX.L:
RBTX.L vs. BOTZRBTX.L vs. AIAG.LRBTX.L vs. IITU.LRBTX.L vs. INTL.LRBTX.L vs. ROBG.LRBTX.L vs. VOORBTX.L vs. RBOD.L
Often compared with EIMI.L:
EIMI.L vs. VFEA.DEEIMI.L vs. CSPX.LEIMI.L vs. AVEMEIMI.L vs. SWRD.LEIMI.L vs. VWOEIMI.L vs. VFEG.LEIMI.L vs. AEME.L

Return for Risk

RBTX.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RBTX.L
RBTX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
EIMI.L
EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBTX.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RBTX.LEIMI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.27
2.83

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.18
3.67

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.53

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

4.78

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.72

16.25

-5.53

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBTX.L vs. EIMI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBTX.L and EIMI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RBTX.LEIMI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.83

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.53

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.60

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.47

+0.30

Drawdowns

RBTX.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBTX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, which is greater than EIMI.L's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBTX.L and EIMI.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RBTX.LEIMI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-31.70%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-10.58%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.28%

-15.79%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.46%

-22.27%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-26.10%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-2.29%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-8.72%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

3.12%

+1.31%

Volatility

RBTX.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) is 7.01%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that RBTX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RBTX.LEIMI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

7.58%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.35%

15.58%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.86%

17.91%

+2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.16%

16.61%

+4.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

18.39%

+2.31%

RBTX.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBTX.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBTX.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RBTX.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

RBTX.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EIMI.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EIMI.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RBTX.L.

RBTX.L is categorized as Robotics, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. RBTX.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBTX.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBTX.L and EIMI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer