RBRK vs. CDNS
RBRK (Rubrik, Inc.) and CDNS (Cadence Design Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — RBRK in Software - Infrastructure, CDNS in Software - Application. Over the past year, RBRK returned -24.49% vs 28.32% for CDNS. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBRK vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBRK achieves a -10.84% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 23.16% return.
RBRK
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- -10.84%
- 6M
- -16.36%
- 1Y
- -24.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDNS
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 10.86%
- YTD
- 23.16%
- 6M
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 28.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 24.39%
- 10Y*
- 31.77%
RBRK vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RBRK Rubrik, Inc. | -10.84% | 17.01% | 69.33% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 23.16% | 4.03% | 8.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBRK and CDNS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2024 | 0.50 |
The correlation between RBRK and CDNS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
RBRK:
$13.89B
CDNS:
$105.37B
RBRK:
-$1.45
CDNS:
$4.28
RBRK:
9.49
CDNS:
19.03
RBRK:
$1.42B
CDNS:
$5.53B
RBRK:
$1.15B
CDNS:
$4.91B
RBRK:
-$275.30M
CDNS:
$1.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBRK vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank
RBRK
CDNS
RBRK vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBRK | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.15 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 0.87 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 1.84 | -2.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBRK vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBRK drawdown since its inception was -56.08%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBRK and CDNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBRK | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.08% | -93.13% | +37.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.52% | -28.85% | -26.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.63% | -7.55% | -24.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.89% | -39.62% | +20.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.39% | 13.63% | +16.76% |
Volatility
RBRK vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) has a higher volatility of 20.37% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 16.52%. This indicates that RBRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBRK | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.37% | 16.52% | +3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.67% | 31.73% | +12.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.64% | 38.94% | +23.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.17% | 36.17% | +28.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.17% | 34.12% | +30.05% |
Dividends
RBRK vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
Neither RBRK nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RBRK vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rubrik, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RBRK vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison
RBRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rubrik, Inc. reported a gross profit of 311.78M and revenue of 387.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.6%.
CDNS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.
RBRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rubrik, Inc. reported an operating income of -52.63M and revenue of 387.07M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.6%.
CDNS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 431.33M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.
RBRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rubrik, Inc. reported a net income of -41.85M and revenue of 387.07M, resulting in a net margin of -10.8%.
CDNS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 335.66M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RBRK and CDNS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBRK has higher volatility (20.37%) compared to CDNS (16.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBRK dropped -56.08% vs CDNS's -93.13%.
CDNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBRK and CDNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer