PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RBOT.TO vs. QTOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RBOT.TO vs. QTOP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RBOT.TO (Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF) and QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBOT.TO is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while QTOP is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RBOT.TO returned 25.99% vs 47.87% for QTOP. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RBOT.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QTOP.

Performance

RBOT.TO vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RBOT.TO is traded in CAD, while QTOP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTOP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBOT.TO achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly lower than QTOP's 24.27% return.

RBOT.TO

1D
-1.02%
1M
4.73%
YTD
9.74%
6M
12.67%
1Y
25.99%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
—

QTOP

1D
0.20%
1M
12.95%
YTD
24.27%
6M
21.48%
1Y
47.87%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBOT.TO vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF		9.74%8.45%3.63%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF		24.27%16.59%9.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RBOT.TO and QTOP is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024

0.58

The correlation between RBOT.TO and QTOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

RBOT.TO vs. QTOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RBOT.TO
QTOP

Industrials

49.0%
0.9%

Technology

29.4%
57.7%

Healthcare

9.4%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
10.4%

Communication Services

5.2%
17.7%

Financial Services

1.0%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

1.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

RBOT.TO
49.0%
QTOP
0.9%

Technology

RBOT.TO
29.4%
QTOP
57.7%

Healthcare

RBOT.TO
9.4%
QTOP
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

RBOT.TO
7.0%
QTOP
10.4%

Communication Services

RBOT.TO
5.2%
QTOP
17.7%

Financial Services

RBOT.TO
1.0%
QTOP

-

Energy

RBOT.TO
0.5%
QTOP

-

Basic Materials

RBOT.TO

-

QTOP
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

RBOT.TO

-

QTOP
8.5%

Real Estate

RBOT.TO

-

QTOP

-

Utilities

RBOT.TO

-

QTOP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF

iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF

Often compared with RBOT.TO:
RBOT.TO vs. XAIXRBOT.TO vs. ROBORBOT.TO vs. RBTX.LRBOT.TO vs. AIQRBOT.TO vs. AIGO.TORBOT.TO vs. CNX1.LRBOT.TO vs. FBOT
Often compared with QTOP:
QTOP vs. TOPTQTOP vs. QQQQTOP vs. QQQMQTOP vs. MAGSQTOP vs. QBIGQTOP vs. VGTQTOP vs. XLK

Return for Risk

RBOT.TO vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RBOT.TO
RBOT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOT.TO vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RBOT.TOQTOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.12
2.82

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.72
3.62

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.49

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

3.60

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.56

11.05

-6.49

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBOT.TO vs. QTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the QTOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOT.TO and QTOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RBOT.TOQTOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

2.82

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

1.53

-1.32

Drawdowns

RBOT.TO vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.86%, which is greater than QTOP's maximum drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT.TO and QTOP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RBOT.TOQTOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.86%

-23.40%

-33.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.78%

-13.37%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.18%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.86%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

0.00%

-7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.62%

-4.55%

-17.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.71%

4.34%

+1.37%

Volatility

RBOT.TO vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) at 5.17%. This indicates that RBOT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RBOT.TOQTOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.42%

5.17%

+3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.89%

13.12%

+4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.33%

17.08%

+6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.53%

22.23%

+3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.89%

22.23%

+2.66%

RBOT.TO vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBOT.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBOT.TO vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison

RBOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than QTOP's 0.32% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF		0.32%0.38%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF		0.12%0.14%0.85%0.11%0.52%0.04%0.17%0.67%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

RBOT.TO and QTOP have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QTOP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QTOP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBOT.TO.

RBOT.TO is categorized as Robotics, while QTOP is Nasdaq-100. RBOT.TO tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RBOT.TO and 0.20% for QTOP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBOT.TO and QTOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer